User talk:Tooba99
| This user is a student editor in University_of_California,_Berkeley/African_Politics_(Spring_2020) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Tooba99, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with Wiki Education; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 17:44, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
Amanda Ostrom's Peer Review
[edit]The Lead provides a solid overview of the article. The introductory sentence could be rephrased to be more clear and concise. Additionally, the second section in the Lead could be elaborated on to specify some of the main barriers that women face, including lack of access to contraception. Overall, the Lead provides a good summary of the article's main points.
The content is relevant and up-to-date. The tone of the content is neutral, and the article does a good job explaining opposing viewpoints on the issue in the last section. Within the Government Family Planning section, the first two sentences read more like an introduction to an argument, rather than a summation of facts, so these sentences could be rewritten to have a more neutral tone. Specifically, the sentence "Unintended pregnancy is the reason that most women in Uganda seek abortions" could be edited to say "Unintended pregnancy is the most common reason that women in Uganda seek abortions."
The sources seem reliable and current. There was a good balance of academic and government sources.
The organization of the content makes sense. It would be helpful to add a section that provides information on the current availability of abortion services before the Post-Abortion Care section to provide context. Overall, the sentences are nicely structured and the article is easy to read.
The article does not include any images; however, I am unsure how relevant any images and media would be to this particular topic, so I do not think it is needed.
Overall, the article appears to cover the main aspects of Abortion in Uganda and provides a clear, concise, and neutral overview on the topic. Great job so far!