User talk:Tonyshan

Welcome!

Hello, Tonyshan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Allan McInnes (talk) 03:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review

I'd like you to peer-review some of my edits in the Enterprise_architecture page. I'm obviously not as qualified as you, but the ads were getting to me. In particular, I'd welcome your contributions to the [EA discussion page], and any comments on my related articles EABOK, Val_IT and Value_Measuring_Methodology. Or you can email me by looking at my David T. Bath 03:47, 6 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not...

Please take a look at the guidelines on what Wikipedia is not. Among other things, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for self-promotion. Adding a reference to your own paper to multiple articles violates that principle. In the future, if you wish to have your own publications included as references please consider bringing them up on the talk page associated with an article, and letting other editors decide whether or not the reference is worth including in the article. You may also want to review Wikipedia's guidelines on autobiographical articles. Cheers. --Allan McInnes (talk) 04:13, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD Nomination: Tony Shan

I've nominated the article Tony Shan for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that Tony Shan satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. I have explained why in the nomination space (see What Wikipedia is not and Deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tony Shan. Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Tony Shan during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. --Allan McInnes (talk) 04:38, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Tonyshan. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Requests_for_feedback/2010_July_21#http:.2F.2Fwiki.riteme.site.2Fwiki.2FCloud_Engineering.
Message added 00:13, 22 July 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Added a reply to your feedback request. Hope it helps! :) Piano tech 00:13, 22 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cloud engineering

The category is there but needs some (several) articles otherwise it is likely to be merged back into Engineering. Occuli (talk) 20:50, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Cloud engineering

The article Cloud engineering has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

neologism, advertising, attempt to create new "engineering" discipline

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joja lozzo 19:47, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Cloud engineering userfied

The article you created at Cloud engineering is not suitable for a Wikipedia article, which must have a notable subject and be verifiable, but it may be a good start for your own userpage. I have moved it to User:Tonyshan/Cloud engineering, which is where you are encouraged to write about yourself. You are free to move it back into the (Main) namespace but bear in mind that if you do so, it is likely to be nominated for deletion.

The purpose of a user page is to enable active editors of Wikipedia to introduce themselves to other editors. Wikipedia is not a general hosting service, so you should not consider your user page to be a personal homepage. Content unrelated to Wikipedia or its editing may be removed.

Please see the user page guidelines, especially this section for more information. -- samj _in ^out 09:58, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Advice

Hi Tony. Thanks for your contributions, which have obviously taken some time to prepare. Unfortunately some of them have not been compliant with wikipedia policy, in particular in that they are not verifiably notable. Please exercise more caution in future as such edits consume not only your time but that of other editors in remediation. Let me know if there's anything I can help with. -- samj _in ^out 10:02, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:FILMImage.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:FILMImage.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. -- samj _in ^out 16:30, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cloud engineering for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cloud engineering is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cloud engineering until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- samj _in ^out 16:55, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]