User talk:Tomtasget

Welcome

Hello, Tomtasget, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} and your question on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Active Banana (^bananaphone 15:25, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zude

Please see WP:DEPROD. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

November 2015

Hello, I noticed that you may have recently made edits while logged out. Making edits while logged out reveals your IP address, which may allow others to determine your location and identity. Wikipedia's policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow the use of more than one account or IP address by one person. If this was not your intention, then please always remember to log in when editing. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 19:23, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tomtasget (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not same as SelgeBrown I am not the same person although we do share a computer and internet connection. We're married. Sorry if that causes confusion or issues. not my intention Tomtasget (talk) 3:00 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

Sockpuppetry, meatpuppetry, whatever. I fully endorse this indefinite block. It's clear you're not here to improve the encyclopedia but only to continue whatever legal disputes you have. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:07, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tomtasget (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Reconsider please -- I was here long before this issue and have contributions going back to 2009 without issue including articles and improvements that have not been contest. Plus I can't control what my spouse does! . Tomtasget (talk) 20:27, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser confirmed abuse of multiple accounts. Mike V • Talk 20:33, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Removing notices from the page

Please note that declined unblock requests (such as those above) are not permitted to be removed from your talk page while you are blocked. Please stop removing them, as if you continue your ability to edit this page will be removed. Which will make it difficult to request unblock in the future if you wish to. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeff Brown (entrepreneur and investor) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeff Brown (entrepreneur and investor) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeff Brown (entrepreneur and investor) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. - Cwobeel (talk) 16:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:DepositionJim McNeilCEO of 5G testifying on the Zude Social Networking Website.png

The file File:DepositionJim McNeilCEO of 5G testifying on the Zude Social Networking Website.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not useful to the encyclopedia; not useful as an image; and the highlight is poor-quality. Apparently the uploader was bringing personal legal disputes onto Wikipedia, and this was a part.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wikiacc (¶) 05:41, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Testimony given in MILLETTE,DOLORES, BRT HOLDINGS INC, BRT SERVICES INC , RILEY HARPER & SONS LTD vs BRT HOLDINGS INC, REPETTI,STEVEN M, REPETTI,ANGELA as it relates to Zude and Steve Repetti.png

The file File:Testimony given in MILLETTE,DOLORES, BRT HOLDINGS INC, BRT SERVICES INC , RILEY HARPER & SONS LTD vs BRT HOLDINGS INC, REPETTI,STEVEN M, REPETTI,ANGELA as it relates to Zude and Steve Repetti.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not useful to the encyclopedia; not useful as an image; and the highlight is poor-quality. Apparently the uploader was bringing personal legal disputes onto Wikipedia, and this was a part.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wikiacc (¶) 05:42, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Steve Repetti Court Ordered Removal As Officer & Director of BRT.pdf

The file File:Steve Repetti Court Ordered Removal As Officer & Director of BRT.pdf has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not useful to the encyclopedia, and borderline WP:F10. Apparently the uploader was bringing personal legal disputes onto Wikipedia, and this upload of a court document was part of that.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Wikiacc (¶) 05:44, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]