User talk:TommyKellyFan2015

Image copyright problems

See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:TommyKellyFan2015 – Jonesey95 (talk) 23:10, 10 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TommyKellyFan2015, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi TommyKellyFan2015! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Dathus (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:21, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jamieson Cup (January 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jamieson Cup and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 23:12, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Tommy Kelly has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Tommy Kelly was changed by TommyKellyFan2015 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860819 on 2016-01-29T05:03:53+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 05:03, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tommy Kelly with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 05:08, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Tommy Kelly 2015B.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Tommy Kelly 2015B.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:06, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Jamieson Cup concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Jamieson Cup, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:36, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mark L'Ecuyer for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mark L'Ecuyer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark L'Ecuyer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. agtx 17:04, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reliable sources

The book you've been relying on for edits regarding Mark L'Ecuyer is not a reliable source, as it is a self-published work. Please only cite reliable sources when you're making edits here. agtx 17:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]