Jump to content

User talk:Tommi1986/Archive Jun21-Dec21

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

91.82.169.34

[edit]

Can you look at this IP user’s edits? I believe their edits are very similar to a another IP that was just issued a one week block. Asher Heimermann (talk) 03:37, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeule

[edit]

I was confused with all the "They" language since Yeule is not a band, Yeule is a solo act. They implies multiple people. Perhaps what would be best is if all the "They"'s were to be replaced with "Yeule". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.242.254 (talk) 21:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeule example

[edit]

Currently... Their first release under the Yeule title was their self titled EP on March 3, 2014.[4]

Proposition... Nat Ćmiel's first release under the Yeule title was their self titled EP on March 3, 2014.[4]

or ....

Yeule's first release under the Yeule title was their self titled EP on March 3, 2014.[4]

In conclusion. I think using "Nat Ćmiel" is best since it makes it clear that Yeule is not a band nor consist of multiple people. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.189.242.254 (talk) 21:23, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Problem user

[edit]

An IP you’ve previously warned about edit warring is currently removing sourced content over at 2021 in American television and I’m not so familiar with templates to warn them about edit warring. I know I’ve been reverting them back, but they’re not even bothering to communicate anything and it feels hyperfixational (the word vindictive comes to mind but I’m not sure it’s the right word to use)--141.157.254.24 (talk) 02:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know I'll keep an eye out!! Tommi1986 let's talk! 08:21, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I just noticed they reported me for vandalism?!!? I have no doubt in my mind they're acting in bad faith now, making false accusations and trying to get rid of me for acting properly--141.157.254.24 (talk) 18:28, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Boppin'B

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Tommi1986. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Boppin'B, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:01, 17 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Removing block notices is okay

[edit]

Hi Tommi1986, thanks for dealing with 2409:4063:4005:2624:0:0:1D03:70B1 – just saying, removing block notices is usually fine; the restriction in WP:UP#CMT refers to {{unblock reviewed}} templates that contain a "decline" parameter. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 23:43, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@ToBeFree: Thanks for letting me know! I knew warnings could be removed and showed that they had been read and acknowledged, but thought block notices had to remain! Always good to learn!! Tommi1986 let's talk! 09:06, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No worries 😊 ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]