User talk:Tomasz1123

January 2023

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to List of Gameloft games. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 15:05, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Star Battalion FREE

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Star Battalion FREE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://toucharcade.com/games/star-battalion-free. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 15:06, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

"I wanna keep it" is not a valid reason. Drmies (talk) 15:12, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 15:19, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Well well, you couldn't stop with that nonsense? [1] Drmies (talk) 15:49, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tomasz1123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Edit but do not add spam or advertising

Decline reason:

Confirmed block evasion, making edits inappropriate enough they had to be stricken from the record. Your best bet is to edit another project for at least six months, then come back and show us those edits. The edits should be significant, free from spam and all other problems. You can then apply under the terms outlined in WP:SO. Yamla (talk) 22:48, 30 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

{{unblock|Edit but the edits should be significant, free from spam and all other problems

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tomasz1123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Unblock this user but no advertising and spam on Wikipedia

Decline reason:

As Yamla says below. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:48, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Confirmed block evasion within the past week. I strongly suggest declining the unblock request and prohibiting any further time-wasting requests from this user, until they've gone at least six months with zero edits and can show a number of constructive edits elsewhere. --Yamla (talk) 21:13, 17 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Further block evasion as Tomasz22334. This user is now considered banned by the community. --Yamla (talk) 11:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]