User talk:Tom Foolery1

January 2013

Hello, I'm Struway2. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Stephen Kelly (footballer), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.

As this isn't a gossip column, please would you wait until the clubs concerned confirm the transfer is complete, before adding it to Mr Kelly's page together with a link to the club's website page confirming it. Thank you Struway2 (talk) 15:12, 11 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Mathieu Manset. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Giant Snowman 12:32, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Mortimer Common shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. JMHamo (talk) 16:42, 30 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit warring, as you did at Mortimer Common. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. matt (talk) 07:39, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'd suggest you read WP:BIO, one of Wikipedia's notability guidelines. This person is not notable; being listed in the minutes of a parish council meeting does not mean someone is worthy of inclusion. matt (talk) 07:43, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]