User talk:Tom2087

Primary sourced material

You can respond here: Talk:Alice_Bailey#Excessive_primary_sourced_material. I have had a thread open for eight days. (formerly IRWolfie-) Second Quantization (talk) 21:59, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit war on Alice Bailey

Your recent editing history at Alice Bailey shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
You have already made 2 reversions in bad faith, even after being explicitly asked not to both in edit summaries and on the talk page. We're getting very close to WP:TAGTEAM territory here.