User talk:Toini Ivanov

Why is constructive edit called "vandalism"?

What's this - link to your comment on user talk page?

The edit was factually accurate and not vandalism of any kind.

88.118.7.240 (talk) 11:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Music and emotion. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. —Wasell^(T) 11:49, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. EnIRtpf09b (talk) 12:32, 9 March 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Many of your "vandalism" notices appear random

Many of your "vandalism" notices appear random. https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Special:Contributions/Toini_Ivanov Ping @Toini Ivanov 88.118.7.240 (talk) 11:53, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Final warnings

Please do not apply such severe and final warnings to other users without first identifying whether the infraction is severe enough to warrant it. It's called biting the newcomers and it's greatly frowned upon.

I have noticed multiple warnings that you have placed against other users that have skipped straight to final warnings without running through the proper levels; something you should definitely have done in those cases. 99% of the warnings you provide will generally not warrant a single, final warning.

I would seriously recommend that you go to the Counter Vandalism Academy, specifically their further reading section. CommissarDoggo^Talk? 11:54, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Once again, please do not harm other editors in harassment. They will contribute to the worse environment for the encyclopedia. If you are conflicted and not sure what to go, discuss the matter on the talk page first. Thank you for understanding. 2001:EE0:4BC7:BA00:49A4:5AB0:3C6E:D99E (talk) 11:54, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many of your edits have been harmful

@Toini Ivanov: you have been reverting constructive edits and putting threatening vandalism notices left-and-right. See a small sample of good edits that you reverted:

88.118.7.240 (talk) 12:16, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Usedtobecool ☎️ 12:36, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You need to stop

Recently you have posted a large number of inappropriate warnings of individuals' talk pages. These have falsely claimed previous edits of theirs is vandalism and threatening them with being blocked. Please stop such behaviour. Please take much greater care. 80.136.200.213 (talk) 12:37, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Toini Ivanov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Look right, u n me, we is both know I ain't dun nuffin wrong so just gimme a break alright? unblock me now ain't it Toini Ivanov (talk) 13:54, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you would like to request an unblock, you will need to do so on your primary account, and you'll need to do a whole lot better than that. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 14:41, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sock puppets are not tolerated. Declining your request is not a thing for us. But you, first, please exercise greater care per WP:AGF and refrain from making further edits under any circumstance for six months from now on, in comply with WP:BP and WP:SO. Noted for you to know. Thanks. 2001:EE0:4BC7:BA00:49A4:5AB0:3C6E:D99E (talk) 14:22, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Toini Ivanov (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Yeah mate, not gonna happen innit, so just unblock me yeah and we can all go home? Toini Ivanov (talk) 14:55, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Talk page access revoked, you've been told above how to appeal. stwalkerster (talk) 15:02, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Caution

You are making two useless appeals, so you are becoming more restricted to making superfluous edits under a sock puppet's credential. Wait at least six months, a standard offer for who engages or ever engaged in making another account but for illegitimate activities. Please take a minute reading this and understand more of Wikipedia's policies. Regards, 2001:EE0:4BCC:2E80:49A4:5AB0:3C6E:D99E (talk) 01:17, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There's no meaningful chance this user would be unblocked in six months and it was inappropriate of you to imply otherwise. --Yamla (talk) 11:49, 10 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]