User talk:Toggaftnaig
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Toggaftnaig. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Reliable sources
[edit]Hi, you seem to have been here long enough for me to spare you the default template. Just as a reminder, when adding content to articles, it must be based on proper reliable sources. IMDB is not such a source, because most of its content is user generated (so it is not appropriate, like citing Wikipedia is inappropriate). A full list of sources which you should be aware of is available at WP:RSP. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 03:28, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- @RandomCanadian: Which edit of mine is this referring to, exactly? Toggaftnaig (talk) 12:30, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
- Oops, sorry, here but now I realise I got the wrong person. Cheers, RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 14:44, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
Your recent edits in Masturbation
[edit]Hi Toggaftnaig! In your recent edits of the article "Masturbation", you have used insulting language in your edit summaries. It's okay to be frustrated sometimes, of course, but "fuck off" is definitely too much. Also, as far as I can see it came completely unprompted.
Anyway, I've requested for that particular comment to be deleted and look forward to working with you civilly in the future. Regards --Yhdwww (talk) 12:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Toggaftnaig: Please take a hint: Wikipedia requires collaboration. "Fuck off" and "unsourced shit" in edits at Masturbation are not helpful. If you cannot find another way to express the reason for an edit, you will have to not make that edit. Alternatively, find another website. Johnuniq (talk) 22:23, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Never Rarely Sometimes Always - Kieth Merrill edited and restored - is this what your meant?
[edit]I fixed the voice and punctuation. Not sure what else here isn't fact as reported in Variety. What does padding have to do with this review?
Pre One Academy Award voter, filmmaker Kieth Merrill, refused to screen the film due to its subject matter. He is quoted as having “zero interest in watching a woman cross state lines so someone can murder her unborn child.” Eliza Hittman in response speculated that other voters were also not screening the film due to the subject matter. It's unclear if Merrill understood that the screenplay addressed rape and possible incest when he stated that he does in fact support abortion in some extreme circumstances. His refusal was based on a synopsis that he noted "didn’t meet his criteria of entertainment — or coincide with his personal values."
Post One Academy Award voter, filmmaker Kieth Merrill, refused to screen the film due to its subject matter. He is quoted as having “zero interest in watching a woman cross state lines so someone can murder her unborn child.” Eliza Hittman in response speculated that other voters were also not screening the film due to the subject matter. It's unclear if Merrill understood that the screenplay addressed rape and possible incest when he stated that he does in fact support abortion in some extreme circumstances. His refusal was based on a synopsis that he noted "didn’t meet his criteria of entertainment — or coincide with his personal values."
Wiki.12022017 (talk) 04:43, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
March 2021
[edit]Hello, I'm Megaman en m. I noticed that you recently removed content from Ithkuil without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Megaman en m (talk) 09:39, 24 March 2021 (UTC)