User talk:Tobysennet
Tobysennet, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Tobysennet! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 6 January 2017 (UTC) |
See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Tobysennet reported by User:Oknazevad (Result: ), where an editor says you are pushing a blog point of view into articles. At first sight, he has a point and you are risking a block. You may respond to the complaint if you wish. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 15:55, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
February 2017
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. NeilN talk to me 16:28, 18 February 2017 (UTC)- Your next block for disruptive editing will probably be an indefinite one unless you indicate you'll use talk pages to discuss contentious content, drop the aspersions on other editors, and read and follow our reliable sources guideline. --NeilN talk to me 16:29, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 16:38, 18 February 2017 (UTC) |
Tobysennet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
this is not a sock puppetry account. This is the account of a normal user who has only this account
Decline reason:
Only one unblock request is required. SQLQuery me! 04:47, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Tobysennet (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
because I am highlighting that Criticism section of 2 articles is systematically removed, not entering in the contents details and recognizing to other party the right to edit everything and express any different opinion.
Decline reason:
This does not address the reason you were blocked. Yamla (talk) 13:33, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.