Jump to content

User talk:TobiasXOrnicker

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


February 2015

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Salt has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Illuminati confirmed salt

[edit]

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Illuminati confirmed salt, and it appears to include material copied directly from https://forums.wynncraft.com/threads/illuminati-confirmed.59343/.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:12, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Illuminati confirmed salt

[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Illuminati confirmed salt requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dai Pritchard (talk) 14:14, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of )(

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as )(, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lakun.patra (talk) 20:44, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

September 2015

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Ceolwald of Mercia has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:44, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yunshui 雲水 12:00, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TobiasXOrnicker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My friend have been screwing with my account I've never even edited on wikipedia before. I don't see why i have to suffer for my friend's mistakes. I'm trying to research the greek play Oedipus the King by Sophocles but that is it. I hope you see the truth in my request. Thanks again, T.X. Ornicker TobiasXOrnicker (talk) 12:33, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you haven't edited, but your friend has, your account is compromised and will stay blocked. You don't need an account to use Wikipedia for research. Peridon (talk) 20:52, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TobiasXOrnicker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've repented my actions and I will not vandalize again. I will not be disruptive on this website. And I will not except any more dares that lead to me being banned. I love Wikipedia, and I don't want to ruin my experience, but mostly those who see what I post. Thank you for your time, Tobias X Ornicker P.S. (Tobias isn't my real name if that needs to change let me know.) TobiasXOrnicker (talk) 17:54, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have stated your account was compromised by your friend. We don't unblock compromised accounts. See WP:COMPROMISED. Yamla (talk) 18:01, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TobiasXOrnicker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Since it's compromised, can I make a new one? I'd like to do good on this website. Thank you again, Tobias x Ornicker TobiasXOrnicker (talk) 18:10, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I see no indication that having you edit would be beneficial to the encyclopedia. Every single edit from this account was either nonsense or vandalism, with some copyright violations thrown in. This spans multiple months. I don't believe your explanation that "your friend" screwed with your account. Compare also this admission. You can still read Wikipedia.Huon (talk) 18:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TobiasXOrnicker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok Huon, my friends and myself got together and started playing truth or dare. I excepted the dare to post this lousy stuff onto this site. That doesn't mean I don't deserve a second chance. Please consider that please. Thanks, Tobias TobiasXOrnicker (talk) 16:53, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't unblock compromised accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 17:00, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TobiasXOrnicker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Ok, can I make a new one then? I learned my lesson. I want to make this website better. My vadalism has done nothing for me and has ruined my time on the website. Thanks for whoever reads this next, Tobias TobiasXOrnicker (talk) 17:03, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Under the circumstances a standard offer approach could be taken in this case. PhilKnight (talk) 20:54, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TobiasXOrnicker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TobiasXOrnicker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I've already met these those requirements. When do I submit the offer? TobiasXOrnicker (talk) 16:54, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Above... You say your account was compromised, but later you reference "my vandalism". Which one is it? SQLQuery me! 05:32, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TobiasXOrnicker (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

SQL (talk) , to me it counts as both. I let them do it so I'm just as responsible as they are. Also as a sidenote, I've already waited the full six months plus a few extra and I've apologized, should I submit the offer now? TobiasXOrnicker (talk) 17:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I do not believe a word of what you have claimed. I do not believe that this encyclopedia will benefit from your presence. --Anthony Bradbury"talk" 14:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So just to see if I understand you correctly: On multiple occasions, months apart, you let someone else vandalize Wikipedia from your acount, but until now never made any edits of your own. Do you expect us to believe that? Huon (talk) 23:18, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:TobiasXOrnicker&oldid=1087664147"