User talk:Toad02
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
Hello Toad02, and welcome to Wikipedia. Your additions to Oceana (non-profit group) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
- In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are PD or compatibly licensed) it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions, the help desk or the Teahouse before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps in Wikipedia:Translation#How to translate. See also Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 16:29, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Toad02, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! GoingBatty (talk) 19:44, 24 June 2019 (UTC)
Edit warring
[edit]
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.--VVikingTalkEdits 19:34, 25 June 2019 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]
|
The Original Barnstar |
| Great job learning so quickly and making a real different to the Oceana page VVikingTalkEdits 13:32, 28 June 2019 (UTC) |
National Geographic Society page edits
[edit]Hello! I noted that you have been active recently to the NGS Wikipedia page, making edits and engaging with other users to render editorial judgments about how to label and note the page's status. I work with The Society, and was part of our attempts to clean up some of the incorrect details on the page. Though we naively did not realize this would be a problem, it apparently triggered flags based on IP address, revealing a conflict of interest. Our attempts to work on that page were sincere then, and we would still like to go through the proper channels and procedures to work on the page. Would you be interested in assisting with this? Based on your existing interest in the NGS wiki-entry, we're hoping you could apply your editorial judgments to help filter our edits. For example, on simple correction is the line "has awarded more than 11,000 grants for scientific research and exploration." This number is now over 14,000. Source: https://www.nationalgeographic.org/funding-opportunities/
A few other corrections like that could be made. Would you be interested in working with us so these edits could be properly Wiki-approved? Thank you for your time.
Best, Harpo1933 Harpo1933 (talk) 22:36, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- I'd love to help improve the page. If you send me any information that meets Wikipedia's standards, I'll add it to the best of my ability. That being said, Wikipedia should be relying on third party sources as per WP:INDEPENDENT, so it wouldn't be proper to make the correct you're suggestion with the source you're providing. If you can find any reliable third party source saying the same thing, I'll make sure to add it. This also is considered to include legal documents, so if this appears in a tax form (available online), a court case, or something of that variety I could include it. Toad02 (talk) 23:03, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
- I realize I should probably ping you in case you don't follow my page. Sorry. ping. Toad02 (talk) 18:09, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Toad02: After a long delay, I'm circling back to provide some other sources on the issues I'm seeing on the NGS Wikipedia page. Here is what I have, attempting to avoid links from the Society's website:
CEO/President Tracy Wolstencroft - He ceased in this function earlier this year: https://www.bizjournals.com/washington/news/2019/09/17/national-geographic-society-ceo-steps-down-after.html https://blog.nationalgeographic.org/2019/09/17/national-geographic-society-commences-global-search-for-ceo/ A search for a new CEO is ongoing. Mike Ulica is now President and COO of the Society: https://www.nationalgeographic.org/about-us/leadership/ https://www.nationalgeographic.org/about-us/leadership/michael-ulica/ https://sps.columbia.edu/advisory-board-member/michael-ulica
National Geographic "helped to sponsor popular traveling exhibits, such as the early 2010s King Tut exhibit featuring artifacts from the tomb of the young Egyptian Pharaoh." -- The exhibit was at the NG Museum in DC in 2005 before going on tour thereafter: https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2005-jun-16-wk-tutstuff16-story.html https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2005/jul/20/20050720-104846-8429r/
Its Committee for Research and Exploration has awarded more than 11,000 grants for scientific research and exploration. -- Sites outside of National Geographic have identified that the Society has given out over 14,000 grants: https://www.lenfestinstitute.org/local-journalism/lenfest-institute-national-geographic-society-announce-collaborative-reporting-networks-in-delaware-and-ohio-river-watersheds/ https://www.bloomberg.com/press-releases/2019-11-13/morgan-stanley-announces-partnership-with-national-geographic-society-university-of-georgia-to-advance-citizen-science-to-help
The Society's media arm is National Geographic Partners, a joint venture... -- Society and Partners exist in a partnership agreement, and NGP is not an "arm" of the Society. This properly describes it as a "joint venture": https://variety.com/2019/biz/news/national-geographic-gary-knell-disney-fox-1203166778/ The end of this piece in Britannica summarizes the joint venture: https://www.britannica.com/topic/National-Geographic-Society
The National Geographic Society began as a club for an elite group of academics and wealthy patrons interested in travel and exploration. -- This was not the original intention. It was a scientific organization. This online transcription of the first issue of the National Geographic Magazine -- https://archive.org/stream/nationalgeograph11889nati/nationalgeograph11889nati_djvu.txt -- includes a transcript of the founding resolution, about two-thirds of the way down the page, that says: "This society should be organized on as broad and liberal a basis in regard to qualifications for membership as is consistent with its own well being and the dignity of the science it represents." The first issue also listed the specific functions of the Society, none of which involved appealing to a wealthy or travel-minded audience: "The particular objects and business of this Society are: to increase and diffuse geographic knowledge; to publish the transactions of the Society; to publish a periodical magazine, and other works relating to the science of geography; to dispose of such publications by sale or otherwise and to acquire a library, under the restrictions and regulations to be established in its By-Laws."
...his son-in-law, Alexander Graham Bell, succeeded him in 1897. -- The Wired article cited in the annotations has been mistinterpreted--it only says that Hubbard died in December 1897, and then Bell succeed him afterward (without specifying a year). Bell did not succeed him until January 1898: https://www.pbs.org/transistor/album1/addlbios/bellag.html https://www.britannica.com/biography/Alexander-Graham-Bell https://blog.lib.uiowa.edu/eng/alexander-graham-bell-the-man-behind-the-telephone/
Courtyard entrance to the National Geographic Museum -- No, this is the entrance to the M Street Building; the Museum is contained in the 17th Street building across the courtyard. See photograph here: https://www.nationalgeographic.org/events/visit/ https://onthegrid.city/washington-d-c/dupont-circle-downtown/national-geographic-museum The same view is already on Wikimedia Commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:National_Geographic_Museum.jpg
Citation needed for Peter Raven receiving Hubbard medal -- https://www.stltoday.com/news/local/columns/joe-holleman/peter-raven-tabbed-for-national-geographic-s-top-honor/article_e84bcdc1-f612-5498-906e-64366340a632.html https://books.google.com/books?id=_aCeDwAAQBAJ&pg=PR1&lpg=PR1&dq=%22Hubbard+Medal%22+peter+raven&source=bl&ots=q3ZRyuODdb&sig=ACfU3U3d87UipQm5QWG3hjuXzZwmcgm3mw&hl=en&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjstarnrZ_mAhWi1VkKHQu5CLU4ChDoATADegQICRAB#v=onepage&q=%22Hubbard%20Medal%22%20peter%20raven&f=false
Alexander Graham Bell Medal - "Up to mid-2011, the medal has been twice presented" -- This can be updated to include recipient Alex Trebek in 2013: https://www.washingtonian.com/2013/06/14/national-geographics-125th-anniversary-party/ https://www.carnegie.org/awards/honoree/alex-trebek/ https://www.britannica.com/biography/Alex-Trebek https://www.nationalgeographic.com/adventure/adventure-blog/2013/06/14/adventurer-of-the-year-felix-baumgartner-honored-at-national-geographics-125th-anniversary-gala/
Much of the media section of the NGS Wikipedia page, including Magazines, Television programs and channels should more properly be listed under the National Geographic Partners wiki page: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/National_Geographic_Partners This is because all of those media assets were transferred over in the 2015 sale to 21st Century Fox: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/nov/14/how-fox-ate-national-geographic Further, all of those assets were included in the Disney sale: https://www.ft.com/content/bbf5bcce-579e-11e9-8b71-f5b0066105fe
"The Society provides programming to the National Geographic-branded channels worldwide...In addition to its flagship magazine, the Society publishes several other periodicals -- The Society does not publish any magazines; National Geographic Partners does this." -- All of this content would be more appropriately represented on the NG Partners wiki page
"National Geographic Films is a wholly owned taxable subsidiary of the National Geographic Society." -- NG Films not longer exists. The NG library of Films are now distributed by Cosmic Picture: https://www.cosmicpicture.com/about-us/#our-history https://www.giantscreencinema.com/Newsroom/cosmic-picture-launches-distribution-arm-secures-rights-to-nat-geo-gs-film-library https://www.thewrap.com/national-geographic-films-shutting-down-say-insiders-exclusive-33865/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 104.192.166.225 (talk) 21:50, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
August 2019
[edit]
Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. 8.20.65.4 (talk) 14:07, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
- I should have clarified. That was a test to determine the size of a section. Toad02 (talk) 14:29, 8 August 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Happy Earth day!
[edit]
Hello! Wishing you a Happy Earth day on the behalf of WikiProject Environment and WikiProject Ecology.
|
What is this?
What you can do!!
Newly nominated content
Similar events
|
  
|
| |||
--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 05:51, 22 April 2020 (UTC)