Jump to content

User talk:Toa Nidhiki05/Archive 7

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1←Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

Million Award

The Million Award
For your contributions to bring American football (estimated annual readership: 1,289,000) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers. -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:15, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

The Million Award is a new initiative to recognize the editors of Wikipedia's most-read content; you can read more about the award and its possible tiers (Quarter Million Award, Half Million Award, and Million Award) at Wikipedia:Million Award. You're also welcome to display this userbox:

This editor won the Million Award for bringing American football to Good Article status.

If I've made any error in this listing, please don't hesitate to correct it; if for any reason you don't feel you deserve it, please don't hesitate to remove it; if you know of any other editor who merits one of these awards, please don't hesitate to give it; if you yourself deserve another award from any of the three tiers, please don't hesitate to take it! Cheers, -- Khazar2 (talk) 15:15, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

Wow, thanks! Really appreciate it. :) Toa Nidhiki05 15:45, 9 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 September 2013

Congratulations

Hey. Congratulations on getting the Panther's article to FA. It's always tough getting an article to FA, but your perseverance and hard work has paid off! -- Shudde talk 05:02, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

Thanks - I wouldn't have been able to do it without the solid reviews that you and others provided. :) Toa Nidhiki05 22:47, 15 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 18 September 2013

Football

So I wasn't sure where to go with this, the talk page for "current NFL head coaches" isn't very active, so rather then posting there and waiting forever for someone else's opinion, I went to the NFL Talk page and saw you had responded to a few edit requests, so that brings me here to get your opinion. As a big NFL fan, I wanted to find out what current NFL head coaches had won a Super Bowl, not just as a head coach, I already know all those, I wanted to know what coaches have won at any coaching position, defensive coordinator, QB coach and so on. There is a page of current NFL head coaches that lists what coach has won a Super Bowl with their current team, but no list that I was looking for. Do you think it would be a better idea to start a new page altogether making a list of what current coaches have won a Super Bowl at any coaching position, or just add these accomplishments to the current NFL head coaches page? The only reason I was thinking it might be better to start a new page is because looking at the current NFL head coaches page, it is categorized by team, so it doesn't really make sense to me to put that Mike Shanahan won a Super Bowl as offensive coordinator with San Francisco when he and his accomplishments with Washington are listed under Washington. Again, didn't know where to go with this so I'm bugging you. Thanks!Zdawg1029 (talk) 02:34, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

No problem, I'm more than happy to answer questions. In my opinion, it would be best to start a new page, or you could alternatively just put make a cited note after each coach saying they won a Super Bowl outside their current role (like Mike Shanahan's Super Bowl wins with San Francisco and Denver). It might be best to modify the template to specify that coaching record, winning percentage, and accomplishments to make it more clear that accomplishments are in the context of the coach's current team, not their career achievements as a whole. :) Toa Nidhiki05 02:48, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for responding. I just realized that maybe it would be a good idea if I got all the stats together first. If it is enough information, maybe it would be worth starting a new page, but if it isn't that much it probably would be better just to make the notes like you suggested. I didn't even think about those with this idea. Alright let me dig everything up and I'll likely get back to you for some more help with this. I thought it was worth mentioning that information in one collective place on here though, it's interesting information in my opinion.Zdawg1029 (talk) 02:57, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Alright, good idea. I'll be going to bed here in a bit (it's 10:59 pm where I live right now), but I'll certainly be able to respond more in the morning. Toa Nidhiki05 02:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
So I went through and compiled the list, it is longer than I would have guessed. I looked at every coach just in case, even the ones I didn't think had won any. I was surprised by a few things. I put the table on My Talk Page (at the bottom) just so I don't clutter yours up. Keep in mind this would not be the final format for it, this was just quick and easy. So 18 of the total 32 active coaches have won at least one Super Bowl as either a player or a coach, while the other 14 haven't won any. There are 32 Super Bowl wins among the 32 active coaches and only 9 of those 32 Super Bowl wins are the coach with their current team. And unless my eyes are deceiving me, I am fairly certain I didn't miss anything. I think it is enough information to warrant a new page. Thoughts? —Preceding undated comment added 04:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Looks pretty good to me. Obviously the template needs to be improved, but that aside there is enough there to warrant a page IMO. Toa Nidhiki05 14:11, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
I'm working on creating the page right now. The most annoying part are the sources. Do I really have to source stuff like this? And can't I just source it to either the coaches own Wiki page or the Wiki page for the team's season that year? I know you're not supposed to use Wiki articles as your source, but this content isn't really debatable, it's all fact.Zdawg1029 (talk) 18:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Technically, yes, they would be needed. It would take a while but I could help you out in that regard if you need to, because this great website called Pro Football Reference has pages for all head coaches, and includes a list of each coaching position they have held. I would bet that just citing the PFR page after each coach would be enough to satisfy referencing criteria. Toa Nidhiki05 20:59, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Ha I actually found that website before I saw your post here and used it for all the references. It actually made for pretty quick work because they do have where each coach was for each year. So I did the annoying part of putting the table together complete with links and everything, you can see it here, hopefully. I'm not that great at figuring out how to position everything, it could probably use a couple pictures or other random things. Let me know if you have any suggestions, and if you can edit and have time to or want to, then by all means go for it.Zdawg1029 (talk) 00:08, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Great work so far! I'll be looking for images to add and the like. :) Toa Nidhiki05 02:19, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. Definitely let me know if you find some images that would be good for it.Zdawg1029 (talk) 02:28, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2012–13 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team/archive1

I see you are a sports fan based on your FAC nom. Would you consider commenting at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/2012–13 Michigan Wolverines men's basketball team/archive1.--TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 22:27, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

Sure, no prob. I'll have comments up in a bit. Toa Nidhiki05 22:42, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 September 2013

2011 Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup Final FAC review

Thank you for taking the time to read the article and make suggestions. I've followed up on everything you've mentioned so far on the review page and look forward to addressing more as you have time to continue reading. Thanks again. --SkotyWATC 15:39, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Okay, I've followed up on the remaining items you found. Your time and attention already spent on this FAC review are much appreciated. Thank you! --SkotyWATC 21:38, 28 September 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for some of your uploads

Thanks for your uploads to Wikipedia. There is an issue with some of them, specifically:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the images because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the images, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image files themselves. Please update the image descriptions with URLs that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 21:06, 29 September 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 September newsletter

In 30 days, we will know the identity of our 2013 WikiCup champion. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) currently leads; if that lead is held, she will become the first person to have won the WikiCup twice. Canada Sasata (submissions), Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions)—who has never participated in the competition before—and New South Wales Casliber (submissions) follow. The majority of points in this round have come from a mix of good articles and bonus points. This final round is seeing contributions to a number of highly important topics; recent submissions include Phoenix (constellation) (FA by Casliber), Ernest Lawrence (GA by Hawkeye7), Pinniped, and red fox (both GAs by Sasata).

The did you know (DYK) eligibility criteria have recently changed, meaning that newly passed good articles are accepted as "new" for did you know purposes. However, in the interests of not changing the WikiCup rules mid-competition, please note that only articles eligible for DYK under the old system (that is, newly created articles or 5x expansions) will be eligible for points in this year's WikiCup. We do, however, have time to discuss how this new system will work for next year's competition; a discussion will be opened in due course. On that note, thoughts are welcome on changes you'd like to see for next year. What worked? What didn't work? What would you like to see more of? What would you like to see less of? All Wikipedians, new or old, are also warmly invited to sign up for the 2014 WikiCup.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 22:47, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to American football may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Course" /> and [[Pop Warner Little Scholars]] is the largest organization for youth football]].<ref name="Trying to Reduce Head Injuries, Youth Football Limits Practices">{{cite web|last=O'

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:07, 5 October 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2007 Appalachian State vs. Michigan football game may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • [[CBS Sports]]|accessdate=April 22, 2013}}</ref> FCS teams are often paid upwards of 500,000 [[[[United States dollar|USD]] for participating in games against FBS teams. This arrangement

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:42, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 02 October 2013

1924 Rose Bowl

Hello Toa Nidhiki05,

Thank you for taking the time to review my article, 1924 Rose Bowl. I have attempted to address all of your concerns at the nom page. If you find any other issues, or if I have not properly addressed one of your concerns, I'll be glad to fix them. Thanks again, - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 03:33, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 October 2013

The Signpost: 16 October 2013

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter


Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 21:13, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories

Toa: You have deleted my word "soley" in the first sentence of the article referenced above and removed my footnote giving the wording of the "Scientists for 911 Truth" petition. The article is about someone else's theories, and in honesty, I think you should allow them to state their theories the way they want to. You can use the rest of the article to mischaracterize and dismiss them, but at least allow them first to state their subject in their own words. Otherwise, you are knocking down a 'straw man' of your own fabrication. Though you might find that amusing, and even patriotic, it degrades Wikipedia as a platform for sharing verifiable information. (Critical thinkers of course know that Wikipedia is only a starting point for exploring issues as complex as this one.) The problem with the dinosaurs is they weren't very good at learning.

    • I would prefer that you be the one to UNDO your deletion. Thank you.

Bruce Maxwell, Architect Oakland, CA — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stickler4accuracy2 (talk • contribs) 22:03, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

First off, 'Scientists for 9/11 Truth' is not a reliable source. Second, you didn't just add 'soley' - you removed that they are 'conspiracy theories', which they are. This website is not a truther blog, and it is not going to be lowered to that level. Toa Nidhiki05 22:25, 28 October 2013 (UTC)

WikiCup 2013 October newsletter

The WikiCup is over for another year! Our champion, for the second year running, is Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions). Our final nine were as follows:

  1. Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions)
  2. Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions)
  3. Canada Sasata (submissions)
  4. Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions)
  5. New South Wales Casliber (submissions)
  6. Scotland Adam Cuerden (submissions)
  7. London Miyagawa (submissions)
  8. Poland Piotrus (submissions)
  9. Wyoming Ealdgyth (submissions)

All those who reached the final win prizes, and prizes will also be going to the following participants:

  • New South Wales Casliber (submissions) wins the FA prize, for four featured articles in round 4, worth 400 points.
  • Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) wins the GA prize, for 20 good articles in round 3, worth 600 points.
  • Portland, Oregon Another Believer (submissions) wins the FL prize, for four featured lists in round 2, worth 180 points.
  • Scotland Adam Cuerden (submissions) wins the FP prize, for 23 featured pictures in round 5, worth 805 point.
  • Republic of Rose Island Sven Manguard (submissions) wins the FPo prize, for 2 featured portals in round 3, worth 70 points.
  • Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions) wins the topic prize, for a 23-article featured topic in round 5, worth 230 points.
  • Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) wins the DYK prize, for 79 did you know articles in round 5, worth 570 points.
  • Ohio ThaddeusB (submissions) wins the ITN prize, for 23 in the news articles in round 4, worth 270 points.
  • United States Ed! (submissions) wins the GAR prize, for 24 good article reviews in round 1, worth 96 points.
  • The judges are awarding the Oddball Barnstar to British Empire The C of E (submissions), for some curious contributions in earlier rounds.
  • Finally, the judges are awarding Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) the Geography Barnstar for her work on sea, now a featured article. This top-importance article was the highest-scoring this year; when it was promoted to FA status, Cwmhiraeth could claim 720 points.

Prizes will be handed out in the coming weeks. Please be patient!

Congratulations to everyone who has been successful in this year's WikiCup, whether you made it to the final rounds or not, and a particular congratulations to the newcomers to the WikiCup who have achieved this year. Thanks to all who have taken part and helped out with the competition. While it has been an excellent year, errors have opened up the judges' eyes to the need for a third judge, and it is with pleasure that we announce that experienced WikiCup participant Miyagawa will be acting as a judge from now on. We hope you will all join us in welcoming him to the team.

Next year's competition begins on 1 January. You are invited to sign up to participate; it is open to all Wikipedians, new and old. Brainstorming and discussion remains open for how next year's competition will work, and straw polls will be opened by the judges soon. Those interested in friendly competition may also like to keep an eye on the stub contest, being organised by Casliber. The WikiCup judges will be back in touch over the coming months, and we hope to see you all in the 2014 competition. Until then, it only remains to once again congratulate our worthy winners, and thank all participants for their involvement! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 00:24, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 October 2013

WikiCup award

In recognition of your participation in the 2013 Wikipedia:WikiCup, in which you reached round 2. J Milburn (talk · contribs) and The ed17 (talk · contribs) 13:08, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you

The Seattle Sounders FC Barnstar
For your help reviewing and suggesting improvements to 2011 Lamar Hunt U.S. Open Cup Final on it's way to becoming a featured article. Thank you!. SkotyWATC 17:36, 3 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! If you ever need a review on another article, feel free to ask me to do so. :) Toa Nidhiki05 02:08, 4 November 2013 (UTC)

Hey Toa, I'm still working on getting the next section of language for the Health issues in American football article prepped for you to take a look at, but I'm wondering if you might be willing to help me out with another thing real quick. I recently drafted an article for George Atallah, the NFLPA's assistant executive director of external affairs. The article went through articles for creation and was taken live today. However, as you can see, the article is currently an orphan since it's so new. What would you think about adding George's name in the infobox on the National Football League Players Association article under "Important people", to start integrating the article into Wikipedia? Are there any other articles you can think of that should point to the one about George? Cheers! ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 18:23, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Sure, no problem! I don't have my computer me at the moment, but I can go ahead and add him there. I'm not sure of any other articles that could lead to it though. Toa Nidhiki05 20:24, 1 November 2013 (UTC)
Awesome, thanks so much! I'll keep trying to think of other places that might make sense to link the article from. Cheers, ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 17:03, 4 November 2013 (UTC)
Hey Toa, thanks again for this! I just noticed that Atallah's article still has the orphan flag—could you remove that now that the link from NFLPA exists? Also, I'm almost done with the next round of suggestions for Health issues—should have those up either later today or tomorrow. Cheers! ChrisPond (Talk · COI) 20:13, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 November 2013

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Carolina Panthers head coaches, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Fox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 November 2013

Better source request for some of your uploads

Thanks for your uploads to Wikipedia. There is an issue with some of them, specifically:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the images because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the images, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image files themselves. Please update the image descriptions with URLs that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:13, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Out-of-process FAC

Hi, I noticed that you just added an FAC nomination at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/American football/archive2. Please read the FAC instructions—if you have a nomination archived, you can't nominate another article for at least two weeks unless you get permission from the FAC coordinators. Please speak to one of the coordinators listed in the instructions. --Laser brain (talk) 17:41, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

I had thought that rule applied to the same article being nominated twice. Hm. Removing for now. Toa Nidhiki05 17:52, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
It might be a bit confusing. They don't usually mind but I thought I'd let you know. I'm actually looking forward to seeing what you've done with that article. --Laser brain (talk) 17:56, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks. I'm considering requesting an exemption but I think I had too much discussion on my last one to do that. As soon as those two weeks expire though I'm definitely re-nominating. Toa Nidhiki05 18:21, 18 November 2013 (UTC)

Deletion of reliably sourced material at Police state

If you'd like to participate in the discussion regarding this article, please feel free to on the article's talk page here: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Police_state#New_section_.22Features_of_police_states.22 It's considered polite to participate in the discussion before deleting reliably sourced, neutrally worded material from articles such as this deletion you made recently: https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Police_state&diff=582770964&oldid=582765017 Thank you. Ghostofnemo (talk) 06:08, 22 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 November 2013

List of NFL tied games

What I added to the tied games article is relevant to the article and is sourced directly from the Pro Football Hall of Fame. PLEASE do not revert it again. Thanks! Jgera5 (talk) 17:18, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

The purpose of a lede is to summarize, not to throw in random facts that aren't mentioned anywhere else in the article. The number of times a team has tied is not anywhere in this article, with the exception of the last two sections, and there is no full list of them. As a side, it is very poor etiquette here to revert someone without explaining why in the edit summary, as you have now done twice. I would very much encourage you to stop doing that, as it leaves the other person with no clue as to why they have been reverted. Toa Nidhiki05 17:21, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
Ummm...I DON'T THINK I NEED TO EXPLAIN MYSELF IF WHAT IS BEING ADDED IS RELEVANT TO THE ARTICLE AND IS WELL SOURCED. You're clearly inexperienced on Wikipedia. I'm done editing on the page for right now, because clearly there isn't a consensus on the subject. Jgera5 (talk) 18:06, 25 November 2013 (UTC)
If you are going to insult me at least give an insult that makes sense. Toa Nidhiki05 18:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Carolina Panthers players, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Punter and Fullback (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 2 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 04 December 2013

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi t | c 15:30, 9 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 December 2013

The Signpost: 18 December 2013

December 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Christmas Sessions may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • Albums (November 19, 2005)|url=http://www.billboard.com/charts/2005-11-19/holiday-albums|work=[[Billboard (magazine)|Billboard|publisher=[[Prometheus Global Media]]|accessdate=December 20, 2013}}<

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:51, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Better source request for some of your uploads

Thanks for your uploads to Wikipedia. There is an issue with some of them, specifically:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the images because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the images, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image files themselves. Please update the image descriptions with URLs that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:14, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Christmas Sessions, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rick Anderson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 December 2013

1924 Rose Bowl

Well, the 1924 Rose Bowl is back at FAC for the third time. Since you supported last time, I was wondering if you would come back and look at the article again (nom). Thanks, - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 20:57, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Sure, not a problem! I'll have my comments up in a bit. :) Toa Nidhiki05 00:36, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Welcome to the 2014 WikiCup!

Hello Toa Nidhiki05, and welcome to the 2014 WikiCup! Your submission page can be found here. The competition will begin at midnight tonight (UTC). There have been a few small changes from last year; the rules can be read in full at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring, and the page also includes a summary of changes. One important rule to remember is that only content on which you have completed significant work, and nominated, in 2014 is eligible for points in the competition- the judges will be checking! As ever, this year's competition includes some younger editors. If you are a younger editor, you are certainly welcome, but we have written an advice page at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Advice for younger editors for you. Please do take a look. Any questions should be directed to one of the judges, or left on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup. Signups will close at the end of January, and the first round will end on 26 February; the 64 highest scorers at that time will make it to round 2. Good luck! J Milburn (talk · contribs), The ed17 (talk · contribs) and Miyagawa (talk · contribs) 17:33, 31 December 2013 (UTC)

Happy New Year Toa Nidhiki05!

Happy New Year!
Hello Toa Nidhiki05:
Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, HotHat (talk) 05:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC)



Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year 2014}} to user talk pages with a friendly message.

I just hope your year of editing ahead will be great!HotHat (talk) 05:20, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 01 January 2014

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2013 All-Pro Team, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Robert Quinn and Justin Smith (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

List of states and territories of the United States

Hi, I noticed you reverted my edit to add some paragraph breaks to the extremely long opening paragraph of this article. Shouldn't readability trump everything else?Mike Alfa Xray (talk) 19:35, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Readability is important but there is a rule here that basically says ledes should not be longer than four-paragraphs, and even those should be reserved for very long articles. You're edit changed it to six, which is far too large. This is important because this article is a featured list, meaning it is among the best lists on Wikipedia and it needs to follow the rules to remain at that level. Toa Nidhiki05 20:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Christmas Sessions

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Christmas Sessions you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 20:41, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of The Christmas Sessions

The article The Christmas Sessions you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:The Christmas Sessions for comments about the article. Well done! Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of J Milburn -- J Milburn (talk) 22:52, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Carolina Panthers

Hello Toa,

I respect your commitment to fighting against the vandalism of wiki pages and would like to discuss your edit to the Carolina Panthers article. Regarding the statement that the Panthers fans are often outnumbered, I contend that the source is not reliable. Although it bears the name of "Sports Illustrated," it was written anonymously, in 2007, when Vinny Testaverde was the Panthers quarterback. I have been going to Panthers games since they started playing in Charlotte and have never seen a game where the attendees consisted of greater than 50% opposing fans. It would be one thing to say that opposing fans have outnumbered the Panthers, but to use the "often" qualifier before indicates that this article is bogus and possibly written by someone who has never been to a home game.


If you would like to accurately describe the Panthers culture, then maybe try finding something written in the last 5 years whose author is willing to be associated with it. If you are a Panthers fan, why would you want to include a patently false sentence like the one I deleted? Have you been to a home game before? I would like to hear why you think the sentence I deleted should be included in the culture section and will leave this alone if you can substantively show me that Panthers fans are often outnumbered at home by opposing fans.FuzzyDunlop53 (talk) 06:19, 9 January 2014 (UTC)FuzzyDunlop53

If you have any doubts about whether or not I am a fan please consider that I pulled the article to FA status - the only NFL club with that rating. But regardless of that, I see your point on the source and have modified it to more accurately describe what it says. The problem here is I cannot go by what people say, I have to go by what sources say because material must be verified - and a very reliable source (Sports Illustrated) suggests otherwise. Being a fan can't overpower what is accurate or not. Toa Nidhiki05 17:44, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Discussion

If you want to comment, go here to do so.HotHat (talk) 05:03, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 08 January 2014

FA question

Hi Toa Nidhiki05,

I'm Sportsguy17. I am active in NFL and MLB articles. I am currently trying to get two GAs to FA status (Major League Baseball and National Football League) and one former FA (New England Patriots). I've helped articles to GA status (Major League Baseball is one). Can you give me some tips on how to take it to FA status, something I've never done before. I was sent here by Go Phightins!, since you helped promote Carolina Panthers to FA status, and maybe you can give me advice. Sportsguy17 (T • C) 02:50, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Well, my first tip would be to compare to other featured articles. I was the major contributor to getting the NFL article to GA status, and based it for the most part on the Premier League article (with the exception of a controversies section, which is discouraged in most articles). Similarly, I based the Panthers article on New York Jets and Kansas City Chiefs - the two other team articles at GA status. For the most part you can learn good formatting, especially what material is generally needed for a comprehensive article. For the New England Patriots article, I would suggest using the Panthers article as a rough template - don't copy all the sections or rely entirely on it, but seeing as it is a very recent attempt that was lucky enough to get through on one try, it's good to see what would be needed.
For the NFL and MLB articles, I'd be glad to help out. I'm not that knowledgeable about baseball but for the NFL article my major suggestions for content would be to add a section on labor (mainly, the relation between the league and labor disputes with the NFLPA and referee's association). Once that's out of the way I think it could get a shot at FA. For the MLB, I'd suggest adding two new sections at a minimum:
*A section on organizational awards and trophies(ie. the World Series trophy and league trophies/pennants) as well as individual awards. Articles on them are very well-kept and could easily be mined for information.
*Free agency, drafting, and the minor league system. This is the biggest omission from the article and I'm surprised it became a good article without it.
*A section on labor relations with the MLBPA and umpire's associations would probably be warranted due to the high-profile incidents that have happened in relations to them.
Additionally, you might find peer review an invaluable process - assuming you can get people to review it, you can save the trouble of going through a failed FA nomination while weeding out most of the major issues. Toa Nidhiki05 03:19, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of National Football League season receiving touchdown leaders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Billy Wilson, Hugh Taylor, Tommy McDonald and Art Powell

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Featured topics/Casting Crowns studio albums

Hi there. I noticed that you were the one who nominated the Casting Crowns topic, as well as getting the articles to their respective statuses. I noticed that the article Thrive (Casting Crowns album) was created recently and since its a studio album and its coming out soon, a grace period has been set up for it. It goes on for three months after the date the album was released (January 28th the page says) so you'll have plenty of time to get it to at least GA status. Thank you for reading this. GamerPro64 19:44, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

No problem, thanks for the notification. It wasn't aware the grace period was so long! I'll be sure to have everything fixed up by then. Toa Nidhiki05 19:46, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

DYK for List of National Football League season receiving yards leaders

The DYK project (nominate) 16:03, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

The Signpost: 15 January 2014

Number of Democratic and Republican Governors

Why did you revert my January 11 change of the number of Republican and Democratic governors from 30 and 20 to 29 and 21, respectively? Terry McAuliffe (D-VA) was sworn in on that day, replacing Bob McDonnell (R-VA), decreasing the number of Republicans from 30 to 29 and increasing the number of Democrats from 20 to 21. The reversions now make the pages reflect the pre-11th party division instead of the post-11th. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KingOfTheLiberal (talk • contribs) 00:55, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

My apologies, I didn't realize McAuliffe had been sworn in than. I had looked to verify your number on the map of governors and that was not what it showed so I removed it. Clearly the map hadn't been edited yet so my bad. Toa Nidhiki05 01:52, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

Better source request for some of your uploads

Thanks for your uploads to Wikipedia. There is an issue with some of them, specifically:

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the images because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the images, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image files themselves. Please update the image descriptions with URLs that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 03:15, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Toa_Nidhiki05/Archive_7&oldid=1168309188"