User talk:Tngah

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary, as you forgot on your recent edit to White American. Thank you. LjL (talk) 15:45, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to White American. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.

I did use reliable and verifiable sources in the white american article. I really don't know what you're talking about at all. Go back and review these sources yuourself before you assume something that it not correct. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to know what is a reference. Thank you.

Tngah (talk) 02:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you for evading scrutiny to edit war with your IPs per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tngah. This behaviour is unacceptable. If you wish to request an unblock, type {{unblock|your reason here}}, but you must be prepared not to edit war and not to use IPs to evade scrutiny. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:40, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did not engage in any edit war with anyone. What's interesting is you block me for contributing to wiki with reliable sources, yet you don't reprimand the author of the article for his errors. I don't understand this. No matter, because I will start my own articles WITH PLENTY of sources. But you must be prepared to NOT edit war with me and use another user name to evade scrutiny.

Tngah (talk) 02:55, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You mean the same as you're doing? Anyway, starting "your own articles" as POV forks is absolutely not alright, if that's what you're saying you're going to do. Don't. --LjL (talk) 13:52, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No, just be a real man about things and stop interfering in others affairs. And I have EVERY RIGHT to start ANY article I damn well please, just as you have the right to create your own racist article. And that's what I'm going to do. I WILL! So, be a real man. Face things like a real man, and grow a backbone and leave us all alone. You constantly being on my back tells me 2 things about you: 1) you probably want me for some sick, homosexual fantasy of yours (which all you americans are known for), and 2) you're a deranged racist with nothing to do in his sexless life.

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tngah for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. WuhWuzDat 17:36, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Like I said before, how can I be accused of sockpuppetry if the author isn't accused of the same thing? Again, this makes no sense.

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:Tngah, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. --LjL (talk) 20:20, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And what is the warning for you when you personally attack others like myself who try to contribute to wiki? And what is the penalty for you when you delete other people's legitimate info with proven references on the article? You know, I'm just FULLY satisfied with your reaction to my comment. Such a reaction tells me that I told the truth about you... AND IT HURT! See ya!