User talk:Tlönorbis

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A Restatement of the English Law of Unjust Enrichment concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A Restatement of the English Law of Unjust Enrichment, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:06, 18 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: A Restatement of the English Law of Unjust Enrichment (January 20)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit when you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A Restatement of the English Law of Unjust Enrichment.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:38, 20 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Tlönorbis, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

UMelb

Hi there,

A reference is usually used to back up a claim, but in that, the reference should actually address the issue. In Academia (and Wikipedia does attempt to be a reputable source of information), it would be expected that at least some of the referred article discusses the topic that it was referenced about.

The Media is notorious for not checking their sources or claims. I am sure that newspapers in Sydney, Canberra and Brisbane would never claim that Melbourne is the most prestigious. Indeed, the ANU is often ranked first in international rankings, so many would consider it the most prestigious.

If the referenced articles had discussed the issue of prestige, and then came to the conclusion what Melbourne has that title for all of Australia, then it would be a reasonable claim to cite. However, the articles seemed much more interested in criticising the university, so it appears that they sensationalised the article by off-handedly claiming that Melbourne was the most prestigious.

Many in Melbourne University would probably prefer those articles to disappear rather than be used to back up a claim about their prestige!

Cheers, Brad — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bradhall71 (talk • contribs) 05:02, 3 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A Restatement of the English Law of Unjust Enrichment

Hello Tlönorbis. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "A Restatement of the English Law of Unjust Enrichment".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A Restatement of the English Law of Unjust Enrichment}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 18:38, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC A Restatement of the English Law of Unjust Enrichment was accepted

A Restatement of the English Law of Unjust Enrichment, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 19:49, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christopher Wright concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christopher Wright, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 2 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christopher Wright

At WP:REFUND#Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Christopher Wright I have said that, while I am unwilling to restore this draft because of WP:BLP concerns, I would be happy to email you the text. If you would like that, you will need to enable email on your account. To do that, click on "Preferences" at the top of the screen, and at the bottom of the "User profile" tab fill in your email address (which will not be visible to me or anyone) and check the box marked "Enable email from other users". JohnCD (talk) 14:31, 21 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there JohnCD. Thanks for your message. I have enabled the email feature - please do email me the text of the article. Tlönorbis (talk)

Done - sorry for delay, I have been on holiday. JohnCD (talk) 20:24, 10 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Melbourne Law School, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Gareth Evans and Greg Craven. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tlönorbis. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]