User talk:Tiyoringo
Welcome
[edit]
|
Interwiki sorting
[edit]Hi Tiyoringo: on this wiki, we sort by local language alpha, not two-letter code. See [1]. —METS501 (talk) 17:27, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
Princess Mako of Akishinoについて
[edit]こんばんは。以前、日本語版でお世話になったことのあるひろくんです。表題の件ですが、貴殿が追加されたpt:Princesa Kako de Akishinoは眞子内親王ではなく佳子内親王のものなので差し戻しさせていただきました。ご了承下さい。正しいpt:Mako de Akishinoを追加しました。--Hirokun 13:02, 26 March 2007 (UTC)追加--Hirokun 13:08, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
こんばんは、日本語版でもお礼を述べさせていただきましたが、リンクが間違っていた他の言語版を修正しました。ご指摘ありがとうございました。--Tiyoringo 13:15, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
Maybe you are interested in this project... --Michkalas 15:58, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
RE:Sumaruさんの疑問にもお答えください。
[edit]- Bolonium氏とは知り合いということです。前に言いましたがBolonium氏が一緒に行動の誘いのメールが来たと。
- Bolonium氏のユーザーページには「Brampton, ON」と書かれたユーザーボックスはないはずですが・・。住んでいる場所を私がどうやって知ったのか、という疑問で聞いているですか？私はBolonium氏が住んでいる場所なんて知りませんでしたよ。上記の質問で答えたように相手からメールが来ました。ということは相手が私のユーザーボックスを見て住んでいる場所がわかったことだと思います。ウィキメールの返事はメールでお願いします。また、英語版のウィキペディアの会話ページに投稿の際はできるだけ英語でお願いしたいのですが・・（en-2だそうですし）。--Staka 00:17, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- あなたがウィキメールを送ったSumaruさんによれば「英語版ウィキペディアのユーザーボックスに「Brampton, ON」と記入されているからです」という発言をされていたようですが、そうではないというのですか言っておられることが度々変わるようではますますあなたの言っていることが信用できなくなります。メールのやりとりでは発言が正しく他の方に判断できかねるであろうことから会話ページを使用しています。日本語版ではStakaさんも、Boloniumさんも投稿ブロックされたので英語版の会話ページを利用することにしました。英語版だからといって会話ページで日本語など他の言語を使っていけないわけではなく、日本語をお互い母語とするレベルならば日本語で話す方がスムーズでしょう。またこれは日本語版でのブロックが妥当だったかどうか日本語版ユーザーが再度判断する必要が出た場合、容易に理解しやすいということもあります。--Tiyoringo (talk) 01:14, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
「英語版ウィキペディアのユーザーボックスに「Brampton, ON」と記入されているからです」は私のユーザーボックスのことだったのですが・・勘違いされたのだと思います。言っていることは変わっていません。--Staka 01:23, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- Stakaさんのユーザーページのどの版でしょうか。ざっと見ましたが、オンタリオ州出身ということは書かれている版はありましたが、Bramptonと書かれたページはないようですが。また、Stakaさんの利用者ページにおける編集回数が100万回という悪ふざけをBoloniumさんがして荒らしと思われリバートされている編集がありますが、このような編集をお互い許す関係なのでしょうか。--Tiyoringo (talk) 04:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- 編集回数が100万回は知りませんでした。それほどの悪ふざけをして許しあう関係ではありません。Bramptonと書かれている版はこれ以降のものです。[2] --Staka 20:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- ところで、Stakaさんの利用者ページに日本語版リンクを追加しているIPユーザーによる編集はStakaさんによるものでしょうか。このIPユーザーの履歴には、Stakaさんが翻訳によって、日本語版へ投稿された後、ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/マドローダムの結果、削除となったマドローダムの日本語版言語間リンクの追加や、Stakaさんがアップロードされた画像（マドローダム、モリゾウとキッコロの写真）の追加をしており、おそらく全てStakaさんの編集と見られますがそのとおりでよろしいでしょうか。IPユーザーによるBolonium氏の利用者ページへの投稿が行われた後、Bolonium氏からIPユーザーに対して警告がなされ、[警告を荒らしと見なしIPユーザーが消去する]といった流れが見られます。一連のこの流れはStakaさんがログインせずにBolonium氏の利用者ページに悪戯をしてその証拠を消去したようにも思えます。User:99.227.234.81の編集は全てStakaさんによるものなのか、一部がStakaさんによる編集なのか、全てStakaさんの編集ではないのかお答えください。--Tiyoringo (talk) 04:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commonsへ画像をアップロードした時刻、そして英語版ウィキペディアの編集した時刻を比べて見てください。画像をアップロードした直後のはずです。違うコンピューターを使用していたためかログインをするのを忘れてしまい、IPで画像を投稿してしまいました。警告の画像をBolonium氏の利用者ページに貼るなどとした編集は覚えがないのですが。Shared IPかなにかでしょうか。
また、「共有アカウントだったのでしょうか」とLoniceraの会話ページにてTiyoringoさんが言っていますが、たぶんBolonium氏はja-4ではなく、それ以下ではないのかと。たまに私に英語の文章を私に渡し、翻訳してくれと頼んできたこともありました。共有アカウントだと思うのなら、私がログインして使用しているIP、そして彼がログインして使用しているIPを全て調べてみればどうですか？同じIPがあれば共有アカウントといえますが。（私はプロバイダーを一度変えているのでIPがアカウント作成時と現在のIPとは違うと思います。また、私は学校でもログインして編集をするなどしたこともあります。調べる場合はIPの数ではなく、同じIPがあるかどうかを調べて欲しいです。）--Staka 20:05, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
- 私にはチェックユーザーの権限はありませんし日本語版の管理者でもありません。日本語版でチェックユーザーの権限を持っているのは、ja:Wikipedia:管理者を御覧になればわかりますが2名の方のみでLoniceraさんはチェックユーザーではありませんし、StakaさんやBoloniumさんのブロックを実施した管理者ではありません。--Tiyoringo (talk) 14:44, 21 December 2007 (UTC)
ウィキメディアのほうも見たのでわかっています。非常に疑っているそうなので、提案しただけです。--Staka 18:16, 25 December 2007 (UTC)
You maybe interested in the Article Rescue Squadron
[edit]
|
Hello, Tiyoringo. Based on the templates on your talk page, please consider joining the Article Rescue Squadron. Rescue Squadron members are focused on rescuing articles from deletion, that might otherwise be lost forever. I think you will find our project matches your vision of Wikipedia. You can join >> here <<. |
You are now a Reviewer
[edit]
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:52, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
You're going too quickly for your own good
[edit]I've been watching your contributions history, and you're reviewing CCI blanked articles at the rate of one every 20 seconds or so. The problem with this is that your zeal to review quickly is overwhelming the need to review thoroughly. I've been through less than a quarter of your recent edits, and have already caught three copyright violations that you missed, at Curtis Myden, Xue Chen, and Takahiro Yamamoto. Please do thorough and proper reviews. Better that you review at a slower pace than that you lose your editing privileges for reintroducing copyright violations. Uncle G (talk) 02:50, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- I understood this occasion. Darius Dhlomo (talk · contribs) edited investigation page for copyright violations. --Tiyoringo (talk) 03:06, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- In a six minute span, from :55 to 1:01 on 25 September, you cannot possibly have reviewed 22 articles as you claim. I am reverting your unblankings to ensure that they receive the necessary thorough review; this seems necessary given that you have overlooked several violations already. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 13:38, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Given your restoration of content like this, you should not remove any more of these templates. I have found several other articles where you restored pasted content (and one where another contributor cleaned up after your copyright violation), but this is the most egregious example I've seen so far. The instructions linked from the template you removed should have made clear that this content could not remain, and, indeed, I have verified the copyright infringement. The speed with which you removed these templates (one every 10 seconds at 17:14 on 25 September) makes it highly questionable whether you gave them any review at all. If you did, it could only have been a cursory one. This is unconstructive. --Moonriddengirl (talk) 14:13, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry. I had misunderstood for the Bot to be driving recklessly.--Tiyoringo (talk) 17:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)
Re:List of Stanley Cup champions
[edit]It was actually an accidental rollback that I missed. I apologize for the inconvenience. -- Scorpion0422 II (Talk) 18:30, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 11
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bubba Bean, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Andrews (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 11 January 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 8
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeff Tedford, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Langley, British Columbia. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 8 July 2015 (UTC)
deprod
[edit]I have removed the {{prod}} tag from AOAart, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the {{prod}} template back to the article. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! 2602:30A:2EFE:F050:A51D:74AE:FC51:1E65 (talk) 21:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Tiyoringo. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Tiyoringo. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 28 November 2023 (UTC)