User talk:Titusfox/Archives/2014/February

Archives

Explaining

I patrolled your page. I went through the enormously-backlogged list of newly-created pages and confirmed that your page was okay: not spam, not an attack page, not a copyright violation, not any of the other reasons for which I would delete someone's page without asking. Then I clicked "patrolled" to remove it from the list of "pages that have not yet been patrolled", and moved on to the next entry. That's all. DS (talk) 16:30, 6 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked vs Banned

Please do not add the "banned user" template to the pages of users who are not banned, as you did here. A block is not a ban. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:08, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please be more careful while reviewing pending changes

I noticed that you accepted this pending change on the Slaughterhouse (group) article. This edit introduced a factual error; no "Slake" is known to be a part of this group. I have reverted the change for now, but please be more careful while reviewing pending changes the next time. You may also want to read Wikipedia:Reviewing#General criteria. Happy editing. Smtchahal (talk) 17:04, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Smtchahal,

I did not know anything about the topic and thought there was a member of said group. Maybe I should be more careful... Regards, Titus Fox 17:11, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

While we're at it, How about a game of Chess? Titus Fox 17:14, 11 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your Arbitration clerk application

Hi Titusfox, thank you for applying to become an Arbitration clerk. At this time we believe you don't have enough the amount of on-wiki experience needed to show us how you would handle some of the difficult and in some cases unpleasant and sensitive situations which Arbitration clerks need to deal with. I encourage you to continue gaining experience with Wikipedia and apply again when you have a few thousand edits. Again, thank you for your interest. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 09:15, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thanks Callanecc! Titus Fox 20:36, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Marsden edit re modeling

This is the message regarding the removal of the modeling claim from marsden's page. I didn't know how to cite the removal because I removed it for lack of citation. This is the explanation of the edit :

Modeling claims

This bio page shows a better citation is needed for Marsden's claim to be a former print and runway model. The current citation is from a bio blurb she herself provided to "specialistspeakers.com" There is no proper citation available because Marsden has never been employed as a print or runway model. There is zero evidence supporting her claim. No print ads featuring her and no runway credits.

Marsden has a variety of photographs taken of her posing in skimpy clothes that were taken by a David Anthony in 1994 when Marsden was 19-20 years old. She used these photographs as part of her harassment of Coach Donnelly at Simon Fraser University in 1994-1995. Donnelly released a few of the pictures to the press during the controversy and Marsden has featured a lot of them on her own websites.

“Last week, Donnelly released e-mail he says Marsden sent offering him sexual favors, as well as photos of her in modelling poses.Photographer David Anthony said this week he took the pictures about three years ago. He said Marsden told him she was interested in someone who didn’t seem to reciprocate the romantic feelings. “She made a comment that maybe these photos would help her get the person,” said Anthony, who added that Marsden appeared to be joking.” (Vancouver Sun: June 6, 1997 Kitchener Record: June 6, 1997: University defends firing coach who skipped hearing) http://bucketsdata.wordpress.com/1997/06/06/kitchener-record-june-6-1997-university-defends-firing-coach-who-skipped-hearing/

She has second set of photographs (see imitation leather suit photos) taken by a Ken Villeneuve, who is a self described “pervert” photographer who advertises his services on Model Mayhem. This is his own description of himself from Model Mayhem "over the hill, overweight, pervy shutter monkey at your service. Will work for peanuts, (the salted in the shell kind), and beer. Satisfaction guaranteed. I shoot implied nudes with my implied camera. Burp..." SEE http://www.modelmayhem.com/65265

Lots of young women have pictures taken of themselves hoping to become a model. They even sign up for modeling classes. They might even do a free "runway" event at the local mall. That is not professional modeling. Marsden does not have professional modeling credentials. I recommend the reference to a nonexistent modeling career be deleted. CammieD (talk) 16:22, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

I didn't put this on her bio page because I didn't want it to look like an attack page CammieD (talk) 17:15, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Yellow Beard Calbal.png

Thanks for uploading File:Yellow Beard Calbal.png. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 22:05, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]