User talk:Titoxd/sandbox/CVU FR task force
It is not a good idea to set up an arbitrary hierarchy of some people being "first responders" and other people being different. It runs counter to the spirit of the wiki, is overly bureaucratic, and doesn't actually solve anything. >Radiant< 11:41, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- Again, is there anything outside of the name that is objectionable? Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 17:56, 15 August 2007 (UTC)
- The bureaucratic hierarchy. >Radiant< 08:13, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- What bureaucratic hierarchy? There are no roles here. This is just a technical implementation proposal about how to code a template. No one gets shiny badges or anything similar. I simply don't see what you're concerned about. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 08:23, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- I suspect it's mostly a matter of terms used. As I see on the CVU talk page, the worst parts are already dropped. >Radiant< 11:09, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- What bureaucratic hierarchy? There are no roles here. This is just a technical implementation proposal about how to code a template. No one gets shiny badges or anything similar. I simply don't see what you're concerned about. Titoxd(?!? - cool stuff) 08:23, 16 August 2007 (UTC)
- The bureaucratic hierarchy. >Radiant< 08:13, 16 August 2007 (UTC)