User talk:TinyAndo10

October 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. MarnetteD|Talk 04:49, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'm going to try to be as respectful as possible. First off, the democratic party registration numbers need to be updated. There is a new source from 2022 that I know you did not look at. Second, you need to find a better source than the Denver Post which is clearly biased to the left. I know you are as well according to your profile. I know how people like you think "no hate is welcome here," then you berate people who don't believe like you and call them fascists and the new party of Hitler. I've seen it time and time again. Set your personal beliefs aside and look at what each side has done. There are some far right extremists and far left extremists. Not a lot, but they exist. You revert my edits removing far right from the party ideology, but then say the democratic party is center? Did you see what happened in 2020? Vandalizing the capital in the name of mostly criminals? Defund the police, remember that? Or are you not from Colorado? How do you know the political landscape of Colorado if you do not live in the state? You were so quick to judge my edits, instead of reviewing what I edited, you automatically reverted it because it didn't align with your party. Please take a second to review what I said before you revert it again. Thank you for reading this, I know it was lengthy. TinyAndo10 (talk) 05:01, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do not post on MarnetteD's talk page again. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 05:30, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What you gonna do about it? This is a free country. TinyAndo10 (talk) 05:36, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The admins are able to take care of it, such as the one that blocked you. Also, what did you think you were doing joe jobing another editor? Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 15:37, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean Joe jobing? I did no such thing and I think you're a communist just like the rest of the "respected editors" on wikipedia. There's a reason Wikipedia is not allowed as a source in many schools, and it's because of people like MarnetteD, who care more about opinion than fact. I never realized Wikipedia was so full of communists. TinyAndo10 (talk) 01:28, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oi, who you calling a communist? If you're saying Wikipedia should not be allowed as a source, then you shouldn't be allowed here either, and it's not MarnetteD's fault. Joe-jobbing is the act of posing as one's sock, and that the innocent editor gets blocked due to a skilled joe-jobber. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 01:30, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You knew I was right, so you just deleted my comment and said I "misused the talk page." How professional, really hit the nail on the head with that one. I feel so intimidated by this man who thinks He's Stalin or something. Probably going to send the KGB to my house to put me in the gulag. TinyAndo10 (talk) 02:03, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I'm Stalin, and this a deliberate attempt to waste our time by using your political views as an argument. Magnatyrannus (talk | contribs) 02:15, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. DatGuy^Talk_Contribs 07:27, 8 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

{{unblock|reason= I tried to make a valid contribution to this site. The IP they attempted to try to tie to my account is sherd by other people (college dormitory). The undos made against my contributions were politically motivated. Tried removing biased sources based off opinions rather than facts, but the person that undid my edits believed the biased sources and undid my edits because his vies considered me a vandal. TinyAndo10 (talk) 01:23, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TinyAndo10 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I tried to make a valid contribution to this site. The IP they attempted to try to tie to my account is sherd by other people (college dormitory). The undos made against my contributions were politically motivated. Tried removing biased sources based off opinions rather than facts, but the person that undid my edits believed the biased sources and undid my edits because his vies considered me a vandal. TinyAndo10 (talk) 01:24, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You created a sock puppet in User:Gilbert365, who is even more of a vandal. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:56, 9 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.