User talk:Timotheus Canens/Archives/2016/1

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Timotheus Canens. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Sockpuppet

I believe User:Whoopssorry is a sockpuppet, because his/her only edit was on the article Elagabalus and is trying to start an edit war making controversial edits to change the subject's gender. Psychotic Spartan 123 20:07, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

Because you're less active these days, I went ahead and contacted DGG. Hope you're enjoying the new year! Psychotic Spartan 123 20:42, 5 January 2016 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 January 2016

News and notes: The WMF's age of discontent

In the media: Impenetrable science; Jimmy Wales back in the UAE

Arbitration report: Catflap08 and Hijiri88 case been decided

Featured content: Featured menagerie

Recent research: Teaching Wikipedia, Does advertising the gender gap help or hurt Wikipedia?

WikiProject report: Try-ing to become informed - WikiProject Rugby League

Technology report: Tech news in brief

The Signpost: 13 January 2016

In the media: War and peace; WMF board changes; Arabic and Hebrew Wikipedias

Community view: Battle for the soul of the WMF

Editorial: We need a culture of verification

In focus: The Crisis at New Montgomery Street

Op-ed: Transparency

Traffic report: Pattern recognition: Third annual Traffic Report

Special report: Wikipedia community celebrates Public Domain Day 2016

News and notes: Community objections to new Board trustee

Blog: Inside the game of sports vandalism on Wikipedia

Featured content: This Week's Featured Content

Arbitration report: Interview: outgoing and incumbent arbitrators 2016

Technology report: Tech news in brief

The Signpost: 20 January 2016

News and notes: Vote of no confidence; WMF trustee speaks out

Op-ed: Not a pretty picture: Thoughts on the "monkey selfie" debacle

In the media: 15th anniversary news round-up

Traffic report: Danse Macabre

Featured content: This week's featured content

Blog: Fifteen years ago, Wikipedia was a very different place

The Signpost: 27 January 2016

Op-ed: Lila Tretikov: the WMF needs your input in developing our strategy

News and notes: Geshuri steps down from the Board

In the media: Media coverage of the Arnnon Geshuri no-confidence vote

Recent research: Bursty edits; how politics beat religion but then lost to sports; notability as a glass ceiling

Traffic report: Death and taxes

Featured content: This week's featured content

Hi Again Version 2

Umm, my latest message from December got archived so I couldn't get a final answer. My question was: "If I disagree I could still appeal this, right? Could you refer me to the proper channel to do it? It's still confuses me. There seems to be more than one channel where appeals take place." Once I get an answer I can proceed accordingly. Thanks. TheDarkLordSeth (talk) 10:53, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Bump? TheDarkLordSeth (talk) 18:07, 26 January 2016 (UTC)

Sorry, I saw this and then forgot about it. There are three possible channels, as outlined in WP:AC/DS#Appeals and modifications: to WP:AN, to WP:AE, or to the committee at WP:ARCA. It's your choice. T. Canens (talk) 03:37, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

Given your experience, and your knowledge with my case, which channel would you recommend or believe is the most appropriate? TheDarkLordSeth (talk) 17:29, 27 January 2016 (UTC)

I suspect that you might have a better chance at AN than at AE. T. Canens (talk) 00:58, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks. I'll get to making a case at some point when I have time. Will let you know since you're been involved in this process. TheDarkLordSeth (talk) 12:59, 28 January 2016 (UTC)