User talk:Tim Griffin

Maurice Gerard Moynihan

It is PoV to describe someone as "the greatst civil servant &c &c", this is only the view of the Irish Times, what other sources tell us this? The change I made wasn't vandalism or an ideological edit! Yours, --Couter-revolutionary 02:41, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please pay more attention to detail: the article did NOT claim he was the "greatest civil servant" but ONE OF them - and few people in Ireland would doubt that, except perhaps begrudgers in extremist unionist or republican quarters (and maybe not even them). As for other sources? ... Would the President of Ireland be enough for you? Or Professors Lynch, Lee, UCD or the larger National University of Ireland (which bestowed an honorary doctorate) or the Central Bank itself, which observed that his contribution "to the development of the State was significant and enduring"? So, it's not just the view of the Irish Times. In an event, I have taken KittyBrewster's advice and you hopefully will now be more comfortable with the text.Tim Griffin 09:50, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Civil

I assume you've read this since your attack on me at Talk:Glasnevin Cemetery which i only just seen (Gnevin 21:15, 20 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

No offence meant, but perhaps you could first suggest in the article's talk page, your proposed course of action before engaging in substantial deletions. Let's not consider my remarks as an "attack" on you, but rather a comment on the need to maintain relevance, quality, and literary standards. Tim Griffin 22:23, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't edit my user page with out asking , and read WP:Civil (Gnevin 17:03, 21 June 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Ní thigim 2 - please feel free to absorb the meaning of WP:Civil Tricky 16:20, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:BBG & ODs.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:59, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Tim Griffin. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]