User talk:Tikkuy

Chillin

Consensus is to write the artist's name as Gaga not GaGa, also read about WP:Cite web. That way you can learn about how to not repeat references in the article. Tikkuy, Im just trying to help you to make the article better. Please donot make this difficult for us. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 13:44, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube fails as a WP:RS because of copyright violations. However, if you can use some reliable video sourcing network like MTV or yahoo, I donot have any problem. About The Fame, BDR is already added in the Promotion section. Since it is not a single there is no reason to add it. And there hasen't been any consensus regarding this. User:Bradcro has been against it and even I am also. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 15:03, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Chillin

Hi Tikkuy. You need to stop re-adding this stuff: [1] [2]. Both Legolas and I have repeatedly taken it out, for the reasons Legolas explained above. YouTube is not a reliable source and any claims of "critics say..." need to be backed up with a source citing the reviews. Please work constructively to improve the article; otherwise you're going to start receiving vandalism warnings. Thank you! - eo (talk) 14:45, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The main concern is copyright. There is some explanation at WP:YOUTUBE and on that entire page, actually. As far as the lead section is concerned, I do understand that.... what I could see was a "mixed to positive" claim, and then the "critical reception" section doesn't really back that up. Are there more reviews somewhere? I just see one positive and one negative later on in the article. Afterthought: Ya know, looking at this entire page as I respond to you and Legolas makes me realize there are a bunch of other little things in "Chillin" that need to be fixed too. - eo (talk) 15:18, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You cannot simply add WP:CRYSTAL and WP:RECENTISM language. It is forbidden in Wikipedia. Please stop this and listen to reason. Me and Ericorbit are doing enough to make the page right.--Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:50, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Its not about who is adding what to the article, but about keeping reliable and factualy accurate information in it. I have told you before time and again please go through WP:RS to understand what is reliable and what is not. There are tons of things in the article which is unreliable and a complete fancruft, like myspace, loyola etc. You have to listen to reason and policies, otherwise you have to be blocked. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:16, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comment at Talk:Chillin. And its not my fault that you donot read policies and guidelines when me and User:Ericorbit have time and again asked you to read about WP:RS, WP:MoS and other policies. Since you chose to turn a blind eye on this, we have no other option than to bring it in administrative notice. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 11:12, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And will continue deleting it because you cannot point out to a single delete I make and term it as wrong. I know the policies and I donot hesitate to revert unreliable sources or uncomplianced additions. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:31, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously what rule are you talking about when you fail to make basic additions to articles and dont take into consideration that you are not the only one watching the article. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 12:41, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Gaga discography

Please be careful while editing. You just replaced a formatted reference in this article with an unformatted one. Please refer to WP:Cite web if you donot know about formatting. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 06:45, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wale Gaga.gif listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Wale Gaga.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 13:25, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Lady Gaga

Please donot revert changes without any explanation or reason. Understand what is WP:RECENTISM and WP:N. The reason I had deleted was because such lines as She went on record to tell Kanye that she's "gay. My music is gay. My show is gay. And I love that it's gay." is completely unencyclopedic. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:52, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Also you just reverted this change of mine to introduce another line about the Chillin song. This tendency of edit warring better stop Tikkuy. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 08:54, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

When did I say Chillin cannot be there? However you undid my edit but introduced a line instead. That is edit warring. And there's no point in threatening me because the community as a whole knows my credibility better than yours. Just because I reverted your additions doensot mean that you will go about removing sourced additions and adding unsourced content in Chillin. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:02, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nopes. The source is a forum post and is a downright unreliable source. Even if a 1000 times better source like Billboard is found, a line like I'm gay. My music is gay. My show is gay. And I love that it's gay. And I love my gay fans and they're all going to be coming to our show. And it's going to remain gay." hardly seems encyclopedic and notable. Sorry if I came across a little too rude, I apologize for that. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:09, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The line about chillin can definitely be in. But can i ask you to format the reference? You can see WP:Cite web. It reduces the burden to format it for us. Also I was checking about Yoraps for the info. Problem is Yoraps is published by Voice Publishing Company Inc. which is under GOLIATH company profile. Now GOLIATH appears to be a business solutions sales company. These kind of sources are downright deemed as unreliable in Wikipedia. I believe a reliable source about the tour from MTV was there before Pokerdance deleted it. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:22, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wonderful. Works like a charm! Also this one from MTV has the info about the gay thing. Though it appears to be more about the tour article than regarding the gay icon. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 09:43, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 08:07, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your Problems with Legolas & EO

Just to let you know you might as well leave things go when it comes both Legolas & EO. They both get to do what they want, when they want. I and others reported Legolas earlier in the year for treating the Lady GaGa page as his own and for talking down and being abusive with contributors. Wikipedia never solved the problem and from what I see he is still doing the same thing. I had the same problem with EO (EnricoOrbit) about three years ago on the Pet Shop Boy page. He came in to the argument over the Lady GaGa page and put his two cents in even though he was not involved, simply because the two of us had a disagreement in the past. It was implied I was the problem not Legolas. So I left this page go and now all evidence of all that talk is gone and nothing was ever done about legolas. But I look on the page today and see the same problem is still here. Best bet is to contribute where you can and leave pages that have certain people running them alone, especially when they want to treat it like a dictatorship. I know it shouldn't be that way, but nothing gets done even if you report these people. Legolas called me a "Dick" on the talk pages and they still did nothing about him. If your buddy buddy with certain people at Wikipedia you get to do or say what you want. If your like us, our ideas are not considered important and are thrown to the side. Save yourself the trouble and aggravation and leave the discussion. That's what I had to do. Legolas gets to do what he wants here no matter how many people complain about him (MoovieStarz (talk) 17:25, 1 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Not much you can do

I gave up on the people at Wikipedia doing anything. I add the new weekly #1s at the Page for #1's in Sweden and have been trying to add past years. EO came in and tried to get the pages changed and told me it looked like crap. But others said that it looked no different from any other #1 page. He has since left it alone. They both have a particular idea how these pages should be set up and are unwilling to allow anything different. I just let Legolas know that the page for Madonna's "Celebration" single was missing 11 countries from it's list of Countries where it was #1. This was his response.

"Maximum numbers of charts added are twenty. All of these that you said are extremely minor markets and hence their absence doesnot exactly create any difference."

It hit #1 in 14 Countries. I think that is important. It's also unfair to claim that because they are minor markets they are unimportant. But as you see it's what he thinks the way things should be done. To hell with what anyone else thinks. So I may occasionally speak my mind, I won't bother reporting him. They do nothing about him. (MoovieStarz (talk) 05:38, 17 November 2009 (UTC))[reply]

Lady Gaga discography

Hello. I have edited Lady Gaga discography to restore contentious writer-only credits, with comments at the talk page. As a previous contributor, you may wish to reply to my points or otherwise continue the discussion. Cheers, --Peter Farago (talk) 08:16, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for contributing new article Lady Gaga discography. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be verifiable, by being clearly attributed to reliable sources. Please help by adding more sources to the article you created, and/or by clarifying how the sources already given support the material (see here for how to do inline referencing). Many thanks! PS If you need any help, you can look at Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. --Legolas ^(talk2me) 10:01, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Spirit Indestructible.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ChrisGualtieri (talk) 17:37, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission The Spirit Indestructible

Hello Tikkuy. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled The Spirit Indestructible.

If you no longer want this submission, it will shortly be deleted. However, if you wish to keep it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/The Spirit Indestructible}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will place the undeleted submission in your user space.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. j⚛e decker ^talk 05:17, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]