User talk:Tiggs000

Welcome!

Hello Tiggs000, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

Read the tutorial and learn how to edit a page.
Experiment in the sandbox.
Follow the Simplified Ruleset.
Try to edit from a neutral point of view.
Use talk pages to communicate with other editors.
Be bold in updating pages.
Eventually, read the Manual of Style and learn about the Five Pillars of Wikipedia.
And most importantly, have fun!

If you need any help, see the help pages and glossary, add a question to the help desk, or ask me on my talk page.

I hope you will enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Good luck! — Bcat

Thanks bcat Tiggs000 03:14, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Tiggs000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not sure why I am blocked. What does "sock" mean?

Decline reason:

"Sock" is short for "sockpuppet" and means that this is one of several accounts operated by you in violation of policy. Huon (talk) 19:54, 31 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Tiggs000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This is the only account that I've ever created or used in the past so if you could let me know specifically what I did that was against policy i promise i won;t ever do it again.

Accept reason:

Very old block by admin who is long since blocked and vanished, no SPI or sock categories given, nothing in Talk page history, not a checkuser block. So I see nothing that can be checked and no point in trying to consult anyone who was around at the time - WP:AGF has to win the day here, I think, so you are now unblocked. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:36, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging

Hi, when you upload images make sure you include source info (where is the image from, who hold the copyright to it), and a so called "copyright tag" template. Images without this information will be deleted, images with obvious status such as Image:Maddogje.jpg might get "fixed" by others, like I just did, but please don't rely on this. It creates extra work, and if the image is from a non-obvious source it will be deleted. Thanks. --Sherool (talk) 01:34, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free use disputed for Image:Gnr lies.jpg

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Gnr lies.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Tiggs000 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

68.81.139.11 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

sock

Blocking administrator: not provided.

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly not autoblocked — Chris 08:11, 9 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]