User talk:Tigerten23

Welcome

G'day Tigerten23, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions; they have helped improve Wikipedia and made it more informative. I hope you enjoy using Wikipedia and decide to make additional contributions.

As a contributor to Australian articles, you may like to connect with other Australian Wikipedians through the Australian Wikipedians' notice board and take a look at the activities in WikiProject Australia and associated sub-projects. Wikimedia Australia your local chapter organises editor training workshops, meetups and other events. If you would like to know more, email help@wikimedia.org.au.

If you are living in Australia and want to subscribe to location-based notices, you can add location userboxes to your user page.

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you have any questions, please see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, try the Wikipedia:Help desk, or ask me on my talk page. Or you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Some other resources to help new Wikipedians include:

How to edit a page

Editing tutorial

Picture tutorial

How to write a great article

Article titles

Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Thank you for signing up! JarrahTree 15:22, 7 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Western Australian Speleological Group (November 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Western Australian Speleological Group and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:03, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Tigerten23! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:03, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

interested

in a real life conversation why the wasg article needs help - or even an on wiki discussion for that matter ?

JarrahTree 15:26, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

The WASG article needs help to qualify for a wikipedia article because it lacks published sources.

I plan to improve the article soon.

Thanks Tigerten23 (talk) 01:40, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done - some added, you might have better items, it would be really good to have cite-able cave survey reports that clearly ID WASG - most on trove have ASF attribution... JarrahTree 08:06, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your contribution - I plan to add more later today Tigerten23 (talk) 08:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ːː:: - what is important about these sort of organisations on wikipedia, is the possible array of refs/cites - specially that are not from the organisation itself - but being referred to in WP:RS that are quite outside of the caving community even... JarrahTree 09:54, 28 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]