User talk:Thunderlippps

I noticed you were new, and wanted to share some links I thought useful:

For more information click here. You can sign your name by typing 4 tildes, like this: ~~~~.

Hey thar

Hey, I rolled back your edit to Compton Pirus, but it's not really cause you did anything wrong. A quick hint - reading WP:SPEEDY and WP:AFD might answer your questions about article deletion and how to go about it :)-DE SU 06:00, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mixed martial arts

I really like your edits to MMA; the LnP section especially is much more accurate, clear, and neutral now. Nice writing! The only thing I'm wondering about it the removal of the seattlepi reference, was that intentional? -SpuriousQ (talk) 23:04, 1 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Norteno Discussion

OK let's discuss it here on your page. The fact is that Nortenos openly practice unity and are not limiting it to incarceration. "Surenos" up north who choose to unite together for survival do not represent the feelings of the real goings-on in the true South of California. You claim that they unite *up north* and that Nortenos dont but you know that is just a lie. Yes there are Norteno sets like the broderick boys and franklone or whatever that might not practice unity, but they are few and far between! G.U.N., CUETE, the Northern Expozure series, Northern Warriors 1&2, and most modern Norteno rap albums all have some mention of "uniting the homeboys" at one point or another. Surenos do not value this and thats why their own rivalries will always be the primary concern, and these rivalries dont exist "because they got bored of having no traditional *Norteno* rivals". The primary rival of the typical Sureno at this time is just about any black gang but more specifically any east coast crips. Most others beef first with one another as they have been doing since long before any north/south war was even conceived. To even suggest that Surenos have no one to bang on in Southern California due to the complete lack of Nortenos is comedic. If any side lacks rivals it is the Nortenos and that is highlighted by the fact that Nortenos all seem to agree that just about every Sureno in northern California is a completely fraudulent wannabe soft individual that speaks no english and only wears blue because his brother lent him a shirt and runs at the sight of anyone in red. I know the deal please dont deny that you too feel this way.So fuck norputos and its all about the ~BROWN PRIDE~ and we are growing in hollister and all central califas fuck BPN fuckin lame ass farmers!

Nortenos also seem to pop up in every major area of the USA except Southern California (where their "primary" rivals operate). You would think that would make the area the main target, but I guess it's more important to represent "Norte" in Florida, Chicago, Phoenix and everywhere that has no animosity towards them whatsoever. Surenos are in every city too, but they dont avoid Northern California no matter how fake they may be in real life. There are some real established Sureno sets in the Norte while any signs of Norteno activity in Southern California are not even at the "rumor" status. You state that Surenos only spread to northern land with no rivals, but how did they end up in the Mission District, Richmond, Salinas, San Bruno, Sacramento, Stockton and other Norteno strong holds? Are you saying when they got there the Nortenos had not yet been established and therefore allowed Surenos to set up shop unchallenged? Woodie is a rapper from Antioch California and his popularity is astounding. ( Check out one of his cd's: http://cdbaby.name/w/o/woodie2.jpg ). It is actually shocking that someone as educated as you on the northern cause has never once heard of him. Mac Dre is also definitely a role model for many bay area Nortenos, and that is not a mere opinion. "Romped out Norteno" w/gangsta flea solidified this. This strong bay area rap influence does affect the attitudes of many Nortenos and often they adopt the African American street slang and clothing style, and simultaneously it distinctly separates their style from the general style of their worst enemies, the Surenos.Stockton CA has had many changes in its interpretation on being a Norteno. Young ignorant individuals choose to adapt to a "hyphy" lifestyle, this is garbage and in no way will it ever be condoned by Stockton Nortenos.Rivalries have stated to take place in the streets of Stockton due to this pollution to TRUE NORTENO ETIQUITTE. MR. MIKEY BOY PEREZ STOCKTONE CALIFAS TILL I DIE

Reply when you can. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 1OLB4 (talk • contribs) 09:17, 22 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

AfD nomination of Short-lived recurring characters on Saturday Night Live

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Short-lived recurring characters on Saturday Night Live. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Short-lived recurring characters on Saturday Night Live. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:18, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:32, 1 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Thunderlippps, please don't use edit summaries like this. They're unhelpful to other editors, and come across as rude. Thanks. Polisher of Cobwebs (talk) 22:00, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

December 2011

Your recent editing history at Alien vs. Predator (film) shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block.

If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. --IllaZilla (talk) 22:28, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 50 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 23:07, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:CONSENSUS, WP:BRD, WP:VNT, WP:CIVIL and WP:TRUTH. Thank you. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:55, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of MMA organizations for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article MMA organizations is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MMA organizations until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:08, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]