Messages

== Articles you might like to

WikiProject Involvement Opportunity

Hi again. Philvarner and I have various thoughts on how to restructure the entire mixed drinks and bartending section of Wikipedia, and that also squarely ties in with WikiBooks. Some of these are pretty sweeping changes. Given your apparent interest in articles within this field, I thought you might be interested, and I would value your opinions.

I realize that you may feel a bit intimidated or shy about diving into the middle of such important discussions. You might even feel that you are too new to make any decisions. Don't believe that for a moment. You have a brain (and a pretty good one based on your editing skills), and you have ideas, and you should have no fear expressing them among friends. And I, for one, am your friend there. So please speak up. Don't be shy.

Please visit the Restructure Section to read, discuss, and hopefully help plan these important changes. Thank you. --Willscrlt (Talk·Cntrb) 12:33, 11 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rating the ToK

Hi. I'm trying to get members of the Psychology Project to get together and rate the both the quality and importance of the Tree of Knowledge System. Hope you're interested. Have a great day! EPM 22:05, 17 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again

Sorry. I didn't mean to ignore you. I've just been sort-of computerless for the past week. Now I am heading out of town to visit relatives, and then I have to get caught up on all the work that has backlogged. Mainly I just wanted to tell you not to feel guilty about not helping with the WikiProject, and to just help as and when you can. As you can see, we all have life come up. :-) Take care. --Willscrlt (Talk) 07:03, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

whiskey vs. whisky

The most common convention now is: whisky in Scotland and Canada, whiskey in Ireland and US. See [www.thebar.com] —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Philvarner (talk • contribs) 22:44, 21 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Alright

Then I WILL SUPPORT!!! Dark Ermac 22:07, 22 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

Thanks! You were right--looking at all the different anonymous vandals just in the last three hours, sprotect is the right thing to do. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 03:05, 23 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops

Sorry about that, but I messed up the above coding. Anyway, just click edit this page above and copy what I typed in between CODE STARTS HERE and CODE ENDS HERE, because I can't display the whole text here without going through a long, boring process.... Alex43223^{Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C} 05:04, 25 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The rules

The rules are not hard or fast. Something may be archived after two weeks if it is seen that things are slowing down. I would appreciate it that after we worked with you to get your design approved you don't kick the ladder of those that follow. --evrik ^(talk) 17:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yeah ...

		The Neuroscience Award
		The Neuroscience Award is yours for the keeping. --evrik ^(talk) 23:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Enjoy the star. --evrik ^(talk) 23:02, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

California

We could post the california award, but the original proposer has gone away ... I think we sould let it sit for a few more days. --evrik ^(talk) 23:11, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An Automated Message from HagermanBot

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! HagermanBot 10:34, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

f u thuglas^T|C 11:06, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WPCF.png

Svg - Dunno how. thuglas^T|C 12:54, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since it's a combination of Image:Red star.svg and Image:Flag of California.svg it should be no problem. Just use an program like Inkscape or Sodipodi to edit the file. // Liftarn

oh well im not doing it again man if you wanna do it go ahead. I dont even have the programs. Ill download them for next time. thuglas^T|C 13:00, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I'll put it on my list. // Liftarn

FYI, I created the SVG version of the award as Image:WPCF.svg. Thanks for the design. Mike Dillon 01:51, 11 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Request for peer review

The article Clinical psychology has just been listed for peer review. You are invited to lend your editing eyes to see if it needs any modifications, great or small, before it is submitted to the Featured Article review. Then head on over to the peer review page and add your comments, if you are so inspired. Thank you!! Psykhosis 20:34, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards Coordinator referendum

There has been some conflict at Wikipedia:WikiProject Awards. Please vote on the Coordinator referendum. --South Philly 20:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to see you go, especially under these circumstances. --South Philly 14:27, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Congradulations

For finally getting your award up. Dark Ermac 14:12, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

FYI

The California Star

I award this award to you for your great contributions to California articles. --evrik ^(talk) 23:46, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there!

I just dropped by your talk page to let you know that I'm still alive and well. I also wanted to thank you for the greeting on my talk page. I'm sorry to see you are no longer editing. Hopefully it's not a permanent decision. I know how life can creep up on you at times. Please keep in touch by e-mail. Take care! --Willscrlt (Talk) 11:26, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Douglas_Myers.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Douglas_Myers.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 23:33, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:EEG cap.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:EEG cap.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 5 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:EEG cap.jpg

Please provide the source for this image. This is an image of a medical procedure and unless sourced must be assumed to be a private image and possibly, within the United States, a HIPAA violation. This page was recommended for my consideration following a visual recognition of the patient in question. While this is by no means a definitive method of sourcing, I share the viewer's concern. Until the source can be identified, I will assume good faith. Schz (talk) 21:44, 27 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:EEG cap.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:EEG cap.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:11, 12 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

educational method

Hello. I would like to converse about an educational method based on creating mutual love between individuals and love for science. This methods is primarily aimed at very young children likely up till or below 3 years of age. Would likely work on olders as well provided the environment would have a high incidense of science and love lovers. Also you seem to be midlly similar to me in apearance and in some motivational areas. or perhaps personality i dont know about this.

Mzoltan24 (talk) 07:21, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:File:WPCF.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:File:WPCF.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Arthunter (talk) 16:23, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:MyersTwo copy.jpg

The file File:MyersTwo copy.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]