User talk:Thomasscott2110

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thomasscott2110 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This block has covered an account under my IP address but not my account. Therefore, I am requesting that I am unblocked immediately. I have been blocked unfairly under false pretences

Decline reason:

There's not enough information here to investigate. What other account is involved? What exactly is your relationship to that account? Yamla (talk) 13:28, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: This account was created to evade blocks at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sallysnail4/Archive. This person's only objective on Wikipedia is to misuse his userspace as a webhost. Eagles 24/7 (C) 13:30, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. And I see sockpuppetry of the several accounts was confirmed, so isn't in doubt. I have no doubt here, either. --Yamla (talk) 13:31, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]