User talk:Thomask0

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!Keith-264 (talk) 23:35, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of the Somme

Please include your Oppose and your logic at the talk page, Talk: Battle of the Somme. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:47, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Testing intra-page links

Ba bla

Point to prior

This points to the above section. Adding stuff to allow versioning.

Hello! There is a DR/N request you may have interest in.

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution. Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:59, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Four Noble Truths

Thomas, you're asking to discuss, yet you simply revert to your preferred version. The issues with Dorje's edits have already been discussed extensively; please participate in those discussions, instead of simply re-inserting long chunks of quotes and ignoring those discussions. When you call for "collaboration", you should at least take serious the concerns of other editors, instead of simply ignoring them. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 08:10, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Joshua Jonathan: my mistake. See my reply on the article's talk page. Thomask0 (talk) 16:08, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I went through some of your edits and comments, thinking "Who's this *** dude with only a couple of edits", but I noticed that you made some really sharp and insightfull comments at several pages. I like that. Alle goeds, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:03, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Like "π=4" :) Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 19:04, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 4 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the University of Glasgow page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:28, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Thomask0. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]