User talk:Thomas9877

Why is im blocked I honestly didn't do nothing

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Eagleash (talk) 22:13, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks I really respect your opinion 🙂Thomas9877 (talk) 22:19, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: VVG SQUAD (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nathan2055 was:

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:VVG SQUAD and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:VVG SQUAD, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 22:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thomas9877! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 22:39, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please do not remove declinature notices from draft articles as you did at Draft:VVG SQUAD. Thank you. Eagleash (talk) 23:19, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why, not. The request is declined or I should keep for two months until it's submitted as an articleThomas9877 (talk) 23:23, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It is a Wikipedia policy that the notices are not removed. I have restored it once more. You should not remove it again or it could be seen as disruptive and may lead to the loss of editing privileges. Unless the draft can demonstrate WP:NOTABILITY it is unlikely to be accepted as an article. Eagleash (talk) 23:30, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why it is unlikely to be accepted as an article. It should take no sooner than 8 weeks for it to be accepted as an articleThomas9877 (talk) 23:40, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand now. I agree to wait at least eight weeks for my draft to become an article. Also I will edit my draft once a week. Thomas9877 (talk) 23:44, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict):Because it does not demonstrate notability. I would suggest that you carefully study all the links provided above together with the notability guidelines and you may find WP:YFA and this page to be helpful also. Wikipedia reports on what has been written (in-depth coverage) in multiple independent, reliable sources.

In addition, if you think the draft will somehow automatically become an article in 8 weeks (I do not know why you would think that) that is not the case. All new articles go through a review process to some extent and have to be reviewed and accepted by experienced Wikipedians who are provided with the the tools to do so effectively. Eagleash (talk) 23:53, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you read the help instructions of Articles of Creation you'll know what I'm talking about. Or you saying that my draft have to be an complete draft before being submitted as an articleThomas9877 (talk) 23:59, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can a complete draft demonstrate notability. If that what you are explaining. I just started on this draft. Like I said I'm only go edit it once a week. Cause what you are saying is that my draft I created is an incomplete draft. Also I don't have a problem. I understand I promise 00:11, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

A draft needs to demonstrate notablity (please study the links previously provided) and must include sources to support statements of fact. See WP:REFB for the guidelines on how to correctly add references. If you have seen mention of 8 weeks at AfC, I suspect that this refers to the current estimated time that *could* elapse before a draft is reviewed. It could be less or it could be more. Reviewed does not mean accepted though. Typically, I would say more drafts are declined and returned for improvement, than are accepted. Eagleash (talk) 00:29, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So you saying that my draft should have references Thomas9877 (talk) 00:33, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. All articles have to be sourced. Eagleash (talk) 01:29, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Like what you mean sources to other articles Thomas9877 (talk) 01:30, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also how can my draft get source Thomas9877 (talk) 01:34, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please read *all* of the links that have provided to you. As before WP:YFA and User:Ian.thomson/Howto are helpful in getting started. Wikipedia requires in-depth coverage in multiple independent reliable sources. It is not interested in anything an organisation or subject or anyone connected with it has to say about itself. You will need to find multiple reports in reliable sources and write the article based on what those reports say. As it stands it does not appear that the subject of your draft will be able to demonstrate notability. Just because something exists, does not mean it is worthy of an article in an encyclopedia. Wikipedia is not a form of social media like Facebook and similar sites. Eagleash (talk) 01:46, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sockpuppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sockpuppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 03:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm Blocked for no reason

I don't know who Romello Brooks is I swear I don't. You know what since y'all go do that I'm go envade the block. Thomas9877 (talk) 03:20, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thomas9877 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account is not a sockpuppet and it does not consider Romello Brooks. Also i know why i was block because i use the name Pro Bro. Thomas9877 (talk) 19:22, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have a pretty distinctive way of writing that gives it away, even without the subject matter overlap and the technical evidence. Yamla (talk) 19:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bro I know what y'all doing. I'm not admitted to being Romello Brooks as by adding "Pro Bro". Thomas9877 (talk) 20:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I promise I'm not go add the name "Pro Bro" again. Just unblock me please. Thomas9877 (talk) 20:14, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

So stop thinking im Romello Brooks just stop Thomas9877 (talk) 20:15, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.