User talk:Thomas.legrand
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Thomas.legrand, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Adam and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Adam (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:01, 1 February 2017 (UTC)
Critique of article on Argus operation:
The first introduction paragraph which should be a condensed overview of the article is extremely vague. The information it gives about when the tests took place is unverified ("not verified in body") There is a clear lack of citations, most of the facts presented in the article are not referenced. These examples include the figues given for the funds (at the end of the "objectives" paragraph) and many others. There is not one citation until the beginning of the 4th paragraph. The sub paragraphs are very unequal, some are well documented and detailed like Task Force 88 and others are almost blank like "Tests". Presence of question marks in the table provided at the end==> doubtful information. The article seems to be pretty neutral but it does not provide different opinions on the effectiveness and revolutionary nature of these tests. The author only mentions the positive side, represented here by the New York Times.