User talk:Thmwalker

If you don't mind, here's a few words of advice - you're having a rough go right now. First, go back to Wikipedia's basic principles, and then right on to WP:FIRSTARTICLE. While contemplating this, please please please ensure you have no conflict of interest - that's something that really colours people's interpretations of the first two things. You have been given some good ideas (sometimes rather bluntly) as to what was wrong with your submission. If you have no COI, and you honestly think this person meets Wikipedia's notability standards (which personally I don't, by the way - even after reading your references) then you're welcome to try and write a WP:USERSPACEDRAFT or go through the Articles for Creation process. Beware though, that both are temporary, and neither will permit any appearance of promotion. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 10:36, 30 November 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for reaching out to me. Based on organemike's critiques, I don't really have a brain hence why there was no need to explain to me what was wrong with the original post. I did find out more when he responded to the person who was the subject of the post. I'm open to critique. Interestingly enough when I first began writing I was too technical for the industry that I now work in (I am a fashion writer). Given that I have written for business journals and science guides, it's a little hurtful. But again, I guess that is his way of giving constructive criticism. All I asked was to explain so I understand and don't continue to make the same mistakes or correct the one I made. But as stated, I obviously am not deserving of clarification. But again, I thank you for offering alternatives. But I think it's safe to say that based on the comments from the aforementioned editor, I will never be able to submit anything here. ≠≠≠≠