User talk:Thiyagasothy

Welcome!

Hello, Thiyagasothy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or in other media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. →‎ GS →‎ ☎ → 06:05, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Hello, I'm Dan arndt. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pandarikulam, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Dan arndt (talk) 00:50, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help

Can you please add the map of pandarikulam and the flag of pandarawanniya. In template box. Please search the flag in google it look like 2 swords crossed each 0ther Thiyagasothy (talk) 01:04, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

February 2019

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Pandarikulam. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Dan arndt (talk) 23:53, 27 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Pandarikulam, you may be blocked from editing. Dan arndt (talk) 23:49, 28 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vavuniya Saivapragasa Primary School moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Vavuniya Saivapragasa Primary School, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 02:07, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vavuniya Saivapragasa Primary School Reply

I believed you are after Template:Infobox school. By adding an infobox it doesn’t make it notable - the draft needs to satisfy the criteria under WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG. Dan arndt (talk) 05:10, 4 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Vavuniya Saivapragasa Primary School

Hello Dan Ardnt I'm the principal of that school plz create a page I'll give the notes of it Thiyagasothy (talk) 01:29, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

In that case please read Wikipedia's Policy on conflicts of interest. At this stage I can not find any evidence that the school would satisfy the criteria under WP:NSCHOOL. Dan arndt (talk) 04:01, 5 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

March 2019

Hello. I wanted to let you know that in your recent contributions to Pandarikulam, you seemed to act as if you were the owner of the page. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to Wikipedia. This means that editors do not own articles, including ones they create, and should respect the work of their fellow contributors. If you create or edit an article, remember that others are free to change its content. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan arndt (talk) 01:14, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry

I'm not in that meaning you are apart from Srilanka And you are living in Australia but I Live in Pandarikulam so I know what happens here that why only Thiyagasothy (talk) 01:27, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You need to only include factual information that is supported by reliable secondary sources. To date you have added unsupported information about a number of towns, which potentially will be deleted without any supporting references. Dan arndt (talk) 04:28, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ask

I only add the photo of kavadi don't remove it Thiyagasothy (talk) 11:00, 25 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 1 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Vavuniya Saivapragasa Primary School. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 11:06, 25 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thiyagasothy, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Dan arndt (talk) 00:45, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lynx Dark moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Lynx Dark, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. noq (talk) 12:08, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Anodite

The article Anodite has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable subject and based on one unreliable source

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. lovkal (talk) 10:34, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Anodite for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Anodite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anodite until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. lovkal (talk) 11:23, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions are appreciated, but, in this edit to Anodite, you removed Articles for deletion notices from articles or removed other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. This makes it difficult to establish consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Shellwood (talk) 00:08, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Issuing level 2 warning about removing AfD template from articles before the discussion is complete. (Peachy 2.0 (alpha 8))

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Anodite. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. This is an automated message from a bot about this edit, where you removed the deletion template from an article before the deletion discussion was complete. If this message is in error, please report it.—^{cyberbot I}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:52, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pandarikulam

In future when proposing an article for deletion check the requirements under WP:PRODNOM, in that you can not lodge a propose an article be deleted (PROD) when it has previously been proposed for deletion. If you still believe that the subject of the article is not notable (i.e. doesn't met the guidelines for notability) then you need to nominate it as an Article for Deletion this will enable all editors to enter into a discussion on whether the article should be deleted or not. Noting that you need to follow the proper procedure for nominating an article not 'cutting and pasting' an AfD notice from another article, in this case Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anodite, as you have appear to have done - which is why I have removed the AfD notice. When lodging an AfD you need to clearly state the reason(s) why you believe the article does not comply with the WP guidelines. Dan arndt (talk) 05:15, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Anodite, you may be blocked from editing. Dan arndt (talk) 05:24, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Gates Of Shadow moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Gates Of Shadow, does not have any sources and citations as written, so cannot to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 ^{talk to me | my contributions} 09:00, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pandarikulam

Why have you blanked the page? Xx236 (talk) 09:23, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at Anodite. Dan arndt (talk) 03:55, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked in Commons

Maybe you see it here, maybe you will understand it. You are blocked on Commons now for a month for uploading again copyrighted material. There was on the file a Statement by Disney, that Disney owns this. You have not only iploaded this against all rules (to be clear: you have stolen this image!), no, you also said, it was mede by you. This is a lie. Stealing and lying. In a month, you will have your last chance. The next time you give other peoples material as yous - you will be blocked indefinte. The next time, you upload copyrighted material, you will be blocked indefinite. Commons can not accept such a behaviour. Maybe, when I read about some other issues here, you should inform yourself about what the Wikimedia projects are, what they are standing for and what the major rules are. If you are not agree to them, this is maybe not the right place for you. -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:18, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zarina The Pirate Fairy

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Zarina The Pirate Fairy requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://www.deviantart.com/autumnrose83/art/Zarina-anime-avatar-611028546. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Tulsi Bhagat (contribs | talk) 15:08, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Pixie Dust Tree for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pixie Dust Tree is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pixie Dust Tree until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. SpinningSpark 18:34, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Problematic articles

I have just deleted Pandarikulam Amman Kovil out of hand. The page is so fundamentally problematic that I am not going to waste editors' time with yet another AfD debate over one of your creations. Besides anything else, you copied most of the description on the earliest version of the page from Unpaid News, an article on an entirely different temple. It is highly unlikely that a temple that "[u]ntil 1977...lokked like a hut" could be "an exemplary example of a fully realised Dravidian architecture...[b]uilt between 1500 and 1600 AD". That looks suspiciously like a hoax. At the very least, it shows a completely cavalier attitude to accuracy. We are building an encyclopaedia here, not a blog about things you like. A degree of professional scholarship is required in our writings.

You have now been warned multiple times about creations like this. You have also been warned multiple times about copyright violations. I am requesting that you do not create any more pages without providing at least one reference to a reliable source that verifies all the facts in the article. If you create one more like this one you may be blocked from editing because you are currently absorbing an awful lot of other people's time to clean up your mess. SpinningSpark 16:24, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. - TNT ^💖 19:21, 13 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gates Of Shadow concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Gates Of Shadow, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gates Of Shadow

Hello, Thiyagasothy. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gates Of Shadow".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 07:00, 16 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]