User talk:Thisiswhatwefind

Welcome!

Hello, Thisiswhatwefind, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Thisiswhatwefind/sandbox, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:18, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Thisiswhatwefind/sandbox

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Thisiswhatwefind/sandbox, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 2601:188:0:ABE6:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 17:18, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

As in the song by Ian Dury? I'm just curious! Cheers DBaK (talk) 18:37, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi No, not from Ian Dury although I really like his music. It's a phrase my friend coined before Ians track and I've always liked its laid back caring/not caring connotation. Cheers

aha! Thanks. Great song anyway. Cheers DBaK (talk) 22:09, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Sandboxes are given a degree of leeway, particularly in terms of notability and referencing, but they are not immune from our policies, particularly with regard to copyright infringements and promotional content. Adding links to sales sites virtually guarantees deletion. I note that this article has been deleted three times by three different admins in a week. I'll restore the sandbox and possibly edit out any unacceptable text.

I strongly suggest that you take an off-line copy, since it's likely that the article will be tagged again. As soon as possible you should add independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the band, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the band claims or interviewing its management.

If you have a conflict of interest when editing this article, you must declare it. That's particularly the case if you have a financial stake in promoting the band. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a black hat practice.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Thisiswhatwefind. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Thisiswhatwefind|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. If you are being compensated, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:48, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. As I said above, some leeway is given, but sandboxes aren't immune from our policies. In truth, I think you have been a bit unlucky to have been deleted three times. There is no formal time limit, but given the tribulations of this article, I think you should start adding references meeting the criteria listed above as soon as possible. Make sure that the band meets the linked notability criteria first though, or it may not be a runner. Contact me or

Seraphimblade if you have any queries. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 14:58, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:42, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Direct Drive (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Direct Drive and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thisiswhatwefind, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 03:24, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]