User talk:Thisismyusername1994

Literacy

Hello Thisismyusername1994. I'm an online ambassador from your Global Youth Studies class. I'm glad to see that you're planning on addressing literacy as a topic. As you've noted, that article could benefit from details from non-Western countries, and especially those from the Global South. According to the literacy map on the right, some of the countries with the highest rates of illiteracy are in Africa. If you were feeling especially ambitious, Wikipedia could use an overview article for Literacy in Africa. If you plan to edit the article on literacy, I believe that the best countries to focus on would generally be those in red (Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, South Sudan, Afghanistan) and those in yellow (Senegal, The Gambia, Guinea, Sierra Leone, Chad, Ethiopia). Please note that the article on literacy is already quite detailed and that any additions need to be properly sourced. Regardless, I hope you take a look at the list of countries by literacy rate. Let me know if you have any questions or need any help. gobonobo ⁺ ^c 18:40, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Thisismyusername1994 & Gobonobo! I wanted to get G's feedback and think through next steps for TIMUN94. I agree that the sections on Africa and South America are underdeveloped. I also hope that TIMUN94 can explore how different locations conceptualize of literacy based on context (e.g., Friere). I am not sure how to recommend editing. It looks as thought the literacy article is, in it's list, replicating in some way the list that Gobonobo posted in the comment above. Is extending this really the best use of TIMUN94's editing muscle? Would it be better for you, TIMUN94, to research the meanings of literacy and link readers to the table? Or organize the list/table organized by region? Or another idea? The lengthy list in the original literacy article feels cumbersome to me. Thoughts?

TIMUN94, I will email you about looking for sources around the idea of defining literacy in specific contexts. Cheers! Prof.Vandegrift (talk) 17:04, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank Gobonobo and Prof.Vandergrift for the feedback. I will take both of your thoughts into consideration. Thisismyusername1994 (talk) 22:10, 2 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

TIMU - Congrats on getting all the steps successfully completed. My only feedback is that I would like you to find at least three peer reviewed scholarly articles to use in addition to the statistics you have located. I am happy to talk to you more about this. You are ready to start drafting your edits using the stats you've found. Then, you can look at extending the definition of literacy and adding scholarship about the Global South. Good work!

Prof.Vandegrift (talk) 16:02, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What sections are you working on in your sandbox?

Hello,

I wanted to give you some feedback on your wikipedia edits, but the literacy article is very large and I could not tell what changes/sections you decided to work on in the sandbox. Could you please let me know what sections you've edited so I can give you feedback?

Thank you,

AbbeyMaynard (talk) 17:41, 28 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I added a few short paragraphs about Mali, Senegal, Guinea, Burkina Faso, and Afghanistan to the literacy article in my sandbox. Thisismyusername1994 (talk) 14:46, 30 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:A UNV teacher conducts a small class of children in Burkina Faso, Africa. PHOTO UNDP.png

Thanks for uploading File:A UNV teacher conducts a small class of children in Burkina Faso, Africa. PHOTO UNDP.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 00:53, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]