User talk:This lousy T-shirt/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions with User:This lousy T-shirt. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | → | Archive 10 |
The Signpost: 05 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapter-selected Board seats, an invite to the Teahouse, patrol becomes triage, and this week in history
- In the news: Heights reached in search rankings, privacy and mental health info; clouds remain over content policing
- Discussion report: COI and NOTCENSORED: policies under discussion
- WikiProject report: We don't bite: WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles
- Featured content: Best of the week
- Arbitration report: AUSC appointments announced, one case remains open
The Signpost: 12 March 2012
- Interview: Liaising with the Education Program
- Women and Wikipedia: Women's history, what we're missing, and why it matters
- Arbitration analysis: A look at new arbitrators
- Discussion report: Nothing changes as long discussions continue
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Women's History
- Featured content: Extinct humans, birds, and Birdman
- Arbitration report: Proposed decision in 'Article titles', only one open case
- Education report: Diverse approaches to Wikipedia in Education
The Signpost: 19 March 2012
- News and notes: Chapters Council proposals take form as research applications invited for Wikipedia Academy and HighBeam accounts
- Discussion report: Article Rescue Squadron in need of rescue yet again
- WikiProject report: Lessons from another Wikipedia: Czech WikiProject Protected Areas
- Featured content: Featured content on the upswing!
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence 'review' opened, Article titles at voting
The Signpost: 26 March 2012
- News and notes: Controversial content saga continues, while the Foundation tries to engage editors with merchandising and restructuring
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Rock Music
- Featured content: Malfunctioning sharks, toothcombs and a famous mother: featured content for the week
- Arbitration report: Race and intelligence review at evidence, article titles closed
- Recent research: Predicting admin elections; studying flagged revision debates; classifying editor interactions; and collecting the Wikipedia literature
- Education report: Universities unite for GLAM; and High Schools get their due.
The Signpost: 04 March 2013
- News and notes: Outing of editor causes firestorm
- Featured content: Slow week for featured content
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Television Stations
The Signpost: 11 March 2013
- From the editor: Signpost–Wikizine merger
- News and notes: Finance committee updates
- Featured content: Batman, three birds and a Mercedes
- Arbitration report: Doncram case closes; arbitrator resigns
- WikiProject report: Setting a precedent
- Technology report: Article Feedback reversal
The Signpost: 18 March 2013
- News and notes: Resigning arbitrator slams Committee
- WikiProject report: Making music
- Featured content: Wikipedia stays warm
- Arbitration report: Richard case closes
- Technology report: Visual Editor "on schedule"
The Signpost: 25 March 2013
- WikiProject report: The 'Burgh: WikiProject Pittsburgh
- Featured content: One and a half soursops
- Arbitration report: Two open cases
- News and notes: Sue Gardner to leave WMF; German Wikipedians spearhead another effort to close Wikinews
- Technology report: The Visual Editor: Where are we now, and where are we headed?
I have removed a portion of information on the Topic of Shield Volcano (Iceland paragraph)...because the explanatory link no longer works, and also because the information is not supported by scientific and geological survey. It was not a mistake that I removed it. However I should have explained myself before doing so. Thank you for your understanding and wikipedia is and should be kept as the beautiful source of accurate information that it is today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.119.111.22 (talk) 16:43, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- You and I agree on that. :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 16:48, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
I think that portion of the article should be removed, yet it is you and other admins that have the final decision. Therefore it is your call :) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.119.111.22 (talk) 16:52, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- I'm not an admin yet, just a hopeful. But I say go on and be bold in your editing! — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 17:02, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Thank you Sir. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.119.111.22 (talk) 17:06, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- You're welcome! :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 17:08, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
I tried to remove it again, but again it was reverted. I think I'll give up 'cause someone really wants that broken link piece of information... well what can one man do? :( 79.119.111.22 (talk) 17:15, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- You could try explaining your actions to the editor who reverted you, on their talk page, as you did here, and see what they have to say. — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 17:21, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
That seems to have done the trick. They no longer reverted it :) 79.119.111.22 (talk) 17:46, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
Changes About Chandrapur Page
Hi! Sir, This Is Harshal Sao leaving a message for you regarding the updating process of the weather data for chandrapur which is upto 2000.
kindly please change the neccesary changes and kindly keep the page updated.
Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.198.85.222 (talk) 15:25, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
- You need a source for that change. — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 15:31, 3 March 2014 (UTC)
Editing Lenox Hill Hospital's page
Hi, I am new to Wikipedia editing, so I apologize if any of my actions raised red flags. I work in the PR office of Lenox Hill Hospital and was asked to correct some inaccuracies on the hospital's Wikipedia page, such as the name of the executive director and update outdated information, such as the logo, photo, and hospital rank to current ones. The only changes I wanted to make are factual ones that can be easily verified. Please let me know if this is permissible.
Lenox Hill Hospital (talk) 21:30, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hi there! Your edits actually seem fine; it's only your username which may be problematic for you. What I recommend is you create a new account for yourself, using an original name of your choice, and edit from that account instead. :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 21:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
2014 in Canadian music
Just got your message. Apology accepted, and I appreciate the feedback. User:Therealdavo2 (talk) 13:33, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks and a question
Hello, thanks for saying "hi" a few days ago. It's nice to feel welcome. Since you're the first wikipedian with whom I've made official contact, I was wondering if I could ask you a quick question? I finally started up an account to get to work on the Dora Marsden article, as it's in start-class shape, and a rough one at that I think, and I've done a fairly substantial amount of research into her. My question is this: how do I request that the article be flagged as part of a particular project? If I'm reading the talk page right, it's part of the women's history, philosophy, and anarchism projects--all of which is fine--by I'm a literature academic, and a lot of ink is being spilled about her these days in the English academy (the discipline, not the country) because of her importance to literary modernism. To my mind, that's where her significance lies; she's low importance to women's history and philosophy, and low-to-mid for anarchism, but she's mid-to-high for 20th century literature. Anyway, I hope to have it looking pretty spiffy in a month or two, and I'd like to submit it for review at that point, but I think it's more relevant to the interests of literature specialists than folks working on philosophy and social history. I wasn't sure what forum was appropriate for making a case for this to someone(s). Sorry to be a bother, and thanks again for the welcome.Bercreaup (talk) 21:02, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
- Hello, Bercreaup, and thank you for your message! I would advise leaving a message on Talk:Dora Marsden saying exactly what you just said to me. There doesn't seem to be a WikiProject currently perfectly suited to her, one for 20th century literature, but it might be possible to start one! — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 21:20, 6 March 2014 (UTC)
(test) The Signpost: 05 March 2014
- Traffic report: Brinksmen on the brink
- Discussion report: Four paragraph lead, indefinitely blocked IPs, editor reviews broken?
- Featured content: Full speed ahead for the WikiCup
- WikiProject report: Article Rescue Squadron
COI or not
I am volunteering in a school in Costa Rica and have created an article about the school, because no one else did it before. Is that an COI in your opinion or not? Maybe you can review my article about Guanacaste Waldorf School and tell, if it is neutral enough for Wikipedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gwscr (talk • contribs) 19:31, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- It needs a few tweaks to make it neutral, which I'll gladly help you with, but the basic article is well-written. As for a COI, don't worry, there isn't one because you're editing as a volunteer, not claiming to actually be the school or their administration. :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 21:00, 7 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks a lot for your fixes!!! Now it's ready to be translated into Spanish ;) --Gwscr (talk) 14:28, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
Problem With An Addition Which Should Not Have Been A PROBLEM!
Hello, "This lousy T-shirt",
I was making a simple addition to the Wikipedia page, "Stephen Douglas Johnson". Specifically, I was adding the following: http://www.en.inforapid.org/index.php?search=Stephen Douglas%20Johnson. There is such a page when one keyboards the foregoing into the address bar of one's browser. Yet, when it is added to the Wikipedia page for Stephen Douglas Johnson, something else appears--for instance, "Stephen", "Afghanistan", or something else--even though there is a full page for the subject. How can this be corrected? Or can you possibly do it for me? All help will be welcome.
Thank you!
Deut20Rev4 Deut20Rev4 (talk) 00:32, 11 March 2014 (UTC) P.S. When I hit the "Save Page" and scrolled through the result, I saw that even on your page only http://www.en.inforapid.org/index.php?search=Stephen comes up blue whereas the Douglas%20Johnson does not while the whole thing comes up blue when I type it into the address bar of my browser--hopefully, you will now see the problem. Thank you again. Deut20Rev4Deut20Rev4 (talk) 00:41, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
- Good news: I fixed it! :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 18:10, 11 March 2014 (UTC)
Help!
This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
As a Veteran Editor, I should probably know, but I need help creating a signature for myself and also help designing my userpage. Is there a list of knowledgable volunteers who offer their assistance upon request? Or should I just approach someone whose signature/userpage I like and say, "I really like your signature/userpage; how did you create it; do you mind if I model mine after yours?" — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 13:16, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- There's nothing wrong with nicking other people's ideas on here, so asking someone who's userpage/sig you like is a pretty good idea. That said, you could also try the design centre (most of the stuff on there is rather ugly, IMHO, but what do I know?) Signature formatting is pretty straightforward (see WP:CUSTOMSIG for the rules), but if you have something specific in mind and can't work out how to format it, I'm happy to lend a hand; just let me know. Yunshui 雲水 13:26, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- Great! THANK YOU! :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 13:28, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Thanks
Thank you for my welcome. I'm still finding my way around so may I ask for your help occasionally? Thanks Diana Bassplayer (talk) 20:18, 12 March 2014 (UTC) 12/03/2014 ps I also use a Mac - still going after 9 years.
- Yes, of course, feel free to ask for my help if you need it, when you need it. We who use Macs should stick together! ;) :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 20:26, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
Ways to improve Hometaurus Real Estate Market
Hi, I'm Carriearchdale. This lousy T-shirt, thanks for creating Hometaurus Real Estate Market!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Perhaps you could choose some appropriate categories near the bottom of the article to help improve the overall article and make the article more easily searchable by wikipedia users. Thanks!
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Carriearchdale (talk) 20:04, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
- This is a surprise to me, because that page was originally created when I welcomed a new editor to Wikipedia!
- https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Hometaurus_Real_Estate_Market&oldid=598016022
- They seem to have turned it into an article on their talk page and moved it into the main space afterwards. Nevertheless, I can't resist the challenge of trying to improve the article with some cats and a bit of copy editing. :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 20:24, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Ok, well then that's sort of odd. I will keep an eye on the article, and help to copyedit it. I did a bit earlier, but I will have a good look at it tonight, so I can take off the copyedit message. I am glad to help. Just let me know if you have any questions. (I like your wiki name!)
cheers!
Carriearchdale (talk) 22:36, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Editor Review
Hello, this is just to let you know that your Wikipedia:Editor_review/This_lousy_T-shirt has been completed, one or several editors have provided their feedback on your editor review page. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Happy editing and regards, C3chan2014 (talk) 06:01, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- A TREMENDOUS thank you for the feedback you provided. It will be quite helpful to me (and I appreciate it so much)! Cheers! :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 15:36, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
the edit i suggested have been provided supporting proof in the link to actor politicams page — Preceding unsigned comment added by Literature007 (talk • contribs) 16:12, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Well done! :) Keep up the good work. — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 16:21, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
what make it to not be constructive — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.174.186.163 (talk) 21:01, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
- Assuming you're serious, here's what made your edits to Prince Michael Jackson I unconstructive. Firstly, you typed (PRINCE) in all caps and parentheses, the equivalent of shouting. Secondly, contrary to the guidelines given in the Manual of Style (see WP:MoS), you removed the spacing between an image and the text of the article. Thirdly, you added a link, which would have been helpful and relevant if you had put it in the proper place using the proper format. Finally, after you were reverted, you blanked a huge portion of the article, which is why another editor reverted you. Hopefully, this answers your question. Peace! :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 21:18, 14 March 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 12 March 2014
- Traffic report: War and awards
- Featured content: Ukraine burns
- WikiProject report: Russian WikiProject Entomology
Hi there
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
--Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 22:38, 16 March 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Hometaurus Real Estate Market
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Hometaurus Real Estate Market requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:19, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- I've replied on your talk page. :) This article was actually created by User:Mnyika91[1]. — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 21:41, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
- Apologies. The proper creator has been notified. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 21:45, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
EditorReviewArchiver: Automatic processing of your editor review
This is an automated message. Your editor review is scheduled to be closed on 21 March 2014 because it will have been open for more than 30 days and inactive for more than 7 days. You can keep it open longer by posting a comment to the review page requesting more input. Adding <!--noautoarchive-->
to the review page will prevent further automated actions. AnomieBOT⚡ 07:38, 18 March 2014 (UTC)
Autopatrolled?
You have only created 3 articles despite your autopatrolled rights. Explain why you had it. Eyesnore (pc) 19:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
- https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:This_lousy_T-shirt&oldid=593823011#Autopatrolled. :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 19:38, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
who are u?
who are u? — Preceding unsigned comment added by SmSmSmSmSmSmSmSmS (talk • contribs) 18:06, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
- I am This lousy T-shirt, a Wikipedian. :) Who are YOU? — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 18:12, 22 March 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 March 2014
- WikiProject report: We have history
- Featured content: Spot the bulldozer
- News and notes: Foundation-supported Wikipedian in residence faces scrutiny
- Traffic report: Into thin air
- Technology report: Wikimedia engineering report
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
For your work on WP:AIV. Bearian (talk) 17:34, 26 March 2014 (UTC) |
- THANK YOU! :) That literally made my day! :D — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 17:41, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 26 March 2014
- Comment: A foolish request
- Traffic report: Down to a simmer
- News and notes: Commons Picture of the Year—winners announced
- Featured content: Winter hath a beauty that is all his own
- Technology report: Why will Wikipedia look like the Signpost?
- WikiProject report: From the peak
Edits to Redfin page
Hey there,
Would you mind explaining why you reverted the edits I made to the Redfin page? I spent over two hours adding additional information and identifying parts of the page that were inaccurate or out-of-date.
Thanks.
70.97.65.145 (talk) 21:42, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- I honestly don't remember making that reversion so it can only have been a technical error on my part. That happens every now and then when I edit using my iPad. I'm so sorry it happened! Feel free to revert the edit I made reverting you. :) — This lousy T-shirt — (talk) 21:51, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
- Okay, thank you!
About Haemoglobin
hi, I don't think that I have made a mistake. because I have studied a lot about blood. Hemoglobin is made of Heam and Globin. Globin is a protein. Heam is the pigment combined with the protin (globin) in hemoglobin. You can search in dictionaries or other websites or medical books. I'm sure you will find it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joy Einstein (talk • contribs) 14:20, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
About Haemoglobin
Hi, thanks for your compliments. I don't think that I have made a mistake. because I have studied a lot about blood. Hemoglobin is made of Heam and Globin. Globin is a protein. Heam is the pigment combined with the protin (globin) in hemoglobin. You can search in dictionaries or other websites or medical books. I'm sure you will find it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joy Einstein (talk • contribs) 14:26, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 04 March 2015
- From the editor: A sign of the times: the Signpost revamps its internal structure to make contributing easier
- Traffic report: Attack of the movies
- Arbitration report: Bradspeaks—impact, regrets, and advice; current cases hinge on sex, religion, and ... infoboxes
- Interview: Meet a paid editor
- Featured content: Ploughing fields and trading horses with Rosa Bonheur
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Hello
Sorry about that, this is a shared IP address (I'm not the one who made the edits), but I would like to apologize for the one who did make the edits. Sincerely, 173.230.157.109 (talk) 16:25, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hello! Thanks. Apology accepted. :) —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 22:47, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 11 March 2015
- Special report: An advance look at the WMF's fundraising survey
- In the media: Gamergate; a Wiki hoax; Kanye West
- Traffic report: Wikipedia: handing knowledge to the world, one prank at a time
- Featured content: Here they come, the couple plighted –
- Op-ed: Why the Core Contest matters
The Signpost: 18 March 2015
- From the editor: A salute to Pine
- Featured content: A woman who loved kings
- Traffic report: It's not cricket
.
The Signpost – Volume 11, Issue 12 – 25 March 2015
- News and notes: Wikimedia Foundation adopts open-access research policy
- Featured content: A carnival of animals, a river of dung, a wasteland of uncles, and some people with attitude
- Special report: Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year 2014
- Traffic report: Oddly familiar
- Recent research: Most important people; respiratory reliability; academic attitudes
Article needs it's title changed, but I don't see how to change the title. March 31, 2015
Hello This lousy T-shirt ,
The article on the South Korean singer 'Kim Greem' is incorrectly titled 'Kim Geu-rim'. It appears that this was a mistranslation from the original Korean Wikipedia article. The article that needs it's title corrected is here:
https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Kim_Geu-rim
Her stage name is 'Kim Greem', the title of the article should reflect that, and not her personal name. Could you please change it, or pass it to someone that can change it? Thank you in advance!
For verification, a simple Google image search on 'Kim Greem' will display a variety of her album covers. They all spell her name as Kim Greem, even on her official Korean album releases.
Nematode66 (talk) 21:09, 31 March 2015 (UTC)nematode66 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nematode66 (talk • contribs) 21:06, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, Nematode66! :) I've fixed the article by moving it from Kim Geu-rim to Kim Greem. —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 21:58, 31 March 2015 (UTC)
The Signpost: 02 March 2016
- News and notes: Tretikov resigns, WMF in transition
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Traffic report: Brawling
The Signpost: 09 March 2016
- News and notes: Katherine Maher named interim head of WMF; Wales email re-sparks Heilman controversy; draft WMF strategy posted
- Technology report: Wikimedia wikis will temporarily go into read-only mode on several occasions in the coming weeks
- WikiCup report: First round of the WikiCup finishes
- Traffic report: All business like show business
The Signpost: 16 March 2016
- News and notes: Wikipedia Zero: Orange mobile partnership in Africa ends; the evolution of privacy loss in Wikipedia
- In the media: Wales at SXSW; lawsuit over Wikipedia PR editing
- Discussion report: Is an interim WMF executive director inherently notable?
- Featured content: This week's featured content
- Technology report: Watchlists, watchlists, watchlists!
- Traffic report: Donald Trump, the 45th President of the United States
- Wikipedia Weekly: Podcast #119: The Foundation and the departure of Lila Tretikov
The Signpost: 23 March 2016
- News and notes: Lila Tretikov a Young Global Leader; Wikipediocracy blog post sparks indefinite blocks
- In the media: Angolan file sharers cause trouble for Wikipedia Zero; the 3D printer edit war; a culture based on change and turmoil
- Traffic report: Be weary on the Ides of March
- Editorial: "God damn it, you've got to be kind."
- Featured content: Watch out! A slave trader, a live mascot and a crested serpent awaits!
- Arbitration report: Palestine-Israel article 3 case amended
- Wikipedia Weekly: Podcast #120: Status of Wikimania 2016
Signpost issue 4 – 29 March 2018
- News and notes: Wiki Conference roundup and new appointments.
- Arbitration report: Ironing out issues in infoboxes; not sure yet about New Jersey; and an administrator who probably wasn't uncivil to a sockpuppet.
- Traffic report: Real sports, real women and an imaginary country: what's on top for Wikipedia readers
- Featured content: Animals, Ships, and Songs
- Technology report: Timeless skin review by Force Radical.
- Special report: ACTRIAL wrap-up.
- Humour: WikiWorld Reruns
The Signpost: 31 March 2019
- From the editors: Getting serious about humor
- News and notes: Blackouts fail to stop EU Copyright Directive
- In the media: Women's history month
- Discussion report: Portal debates continue, Prespa agreement aftermath, WMF seeks a rebranding
- Featured content: Out of this world
- Arbitration report: The Tides of March at ARBCOM
- Traffic report: Exultations and tribulations
- Technology report: New section suggestions and sitewide styles
- News from the WMF: The WMF's take on the new EU Copyright Directive
- Recent research: Barnstar-like awards increase new editor retention
- From the archives: Esperanza organization disbanded after deletion discussion
- Humour: The Epistolary of Arthur 37
- Op-Ed: Pro and Con: Has gun violence been improperly excluded from gun articles?
- In focus: The Wikipedia SourceWatch
- Special report: Wiki Loves (50 Years of) Pride
- Community view: Wikipedia's response to the New Zealand mosque shootings