User talk:Thilal

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Martin Winch. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Martin Winch. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! AndrewN ^talk 19:34, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Martin Winch. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chzz ► 04:38, 22 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Martin Winch

Thilal, I have cleaned up the Martin Winch submission a bit, and placed one reference inline for you to copy - you just put each reference in ref tags like the one I've done for you. If you could just add citations where I've indicated they are needed that would be really helpful. Thanks Chiswick Chap (talk) 11:07, 26 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Martin Winch, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia!

Chiswick Chap (talk) 19:29, 4 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Martin Winch.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Martin Winch.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:05, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Help with describing and licensing Martin Winch Image

Hi, I see you've been given a message by the image robot. It would indeed be good to have an image for the article on Martin Winch. You will need to fill in the image description and say where it came from - Wikipedia has to be careful about copyright. Ideally the image will be free, i.e. you took it and you freely give it to Wikimedia Commons (which is not the same as Wikipedia, I know it's confusing); or someone else has already published the image under a free license. Or, it may be possible to use a non-free image provided you write a rationale explaining why the image can fairly be used even though it doesn't belong to you. If I can help you in getting these descriptions written, just ask. with best wishes Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:17, 6 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:PianoByCandlelight.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:PianoByCandlelight.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:00, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for File:A current photo of Carl Doy 2017.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:A current photo of Carl Doy 2017.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 11:01, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How to get permission for a photo

Hi Thilal

good to hear you. There are two different situations.

When copyright in a photo belongs to you (i.e. you took it), uploading is easy, you just put it on Commons (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard, not Wikipedia) and follow the Wizard's guidance. You can use your username or your actual name as you please. It's very unlikely anyone will challenge the upload of a photo you took.

When the copyright is somebody else's you will have to ask them to fill in a copyright permission form. It is called an OTRS ticket (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/OTRS). You get the other person to confirm to an OTRS volunteer that they indeed own the photo and are happy to release it as a free image. It's all explained on that page and the system works well.

(With the existing images, if you did take them yourself, you can add a copyright tag {{PD-self}}, but you may also be required to provide proof (OTRS) you took them now that you have attracted doubt about ownership.)

If you follow the OTRS system all will be fine; there is no way to avoid it.

Hope this helps. (ps I tried other route, it bounced) Chiswick Chap (talk) 06:58, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More here, just in case.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 20:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Carl Doy 2017.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Carl Doy 2017.jpeg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 10:00, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Hello, I'm Path slopu. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to James Cameron— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. PATH SLOPU 10:29, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:36, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]