User talk:The Job

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Theycallmefree! I am LouriePieterse and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

LouriePieterse (talk) 20:19, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation

I'd like to invite you to join the Christian music WikiProject. We are currently looking for new members. To become a member of the project, add the {{User Christianmusic}} userbox to your user page (for an invisible template, use {{User Christianmusic2}}). With your help we can make it one of the best WikiProjects. Remember, cooperative works can do amazing things. Regards, Jamie^☆S93 02:10, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I am a somewhat big fan of Christian music. Sorry I didn't respond earlier, I was on vacation.

Free (talk) ^(HRWiki) 21:59, 26 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christian rock

I'm sorry. I don't know Blessid Union of Souls. They don't seem to be as good an example as the other three bands listed there. The other three are very popular bands. Blessid Union of Souls doesn't seem to meet that criteria. There are many smaller bands or artists who could also be listed but aren't because that is not supposed to be a comprehensive list. Could you give an explanation on the talk page as to why they should be included? --Walter Görlitz (talk) 17:24, 14 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

More on Newsboys

Are Live One Night in Pennsylvania and Shine: The Hits Live-One Night in Pennsylvania the same video or are they different? I'm not big on their videos. Someone deleted the former in the discography and I updated the template. I just don't know. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 21:13, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jesus Freak Hideout has both of them listed in their videography section for their Newsboys discography, so I'm assuming different. Free (talk) ^(HRWiki) 21:35, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to hijack a section of your talk page, but...

I just wanted to thank you for helping me keep the page for Save Me San Francisco cleaned up, well-sourced and accurate. I appreciate it!--Musicool2 (talk) 14:10, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome, though I didn't do all that much. I'm kind of a neat freak. Free (talk) ^(HRWiki) 16:01, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your User Page

Hi, Could you remove the advertising from your user page? Please read WP:NOT. Thanks. Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 13:48, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. Didn't mean to advertise.

Free (talk) ^(HRWiki) 14:25, 29 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, thanks for that :-) Dylanfromthenorth (talk) 11:11, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free quotation of lyrics

Hi there TCMF. Could you please remove the quoted lyrics from your userpage? Lyrics are copyrighted, and unless it's a short quotation for the purpose of encyclopedic value (see WP:NFC#Text), it could be in violation of the non-free content policy. Whether large quotations (in the user-space) are a copyright violation has actually been a debated issue, as evidenced by this recent MfD, but I'd just remove it to be safe. Thanks, JamieS93 13:56, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Free (talk) ^(HRWiki) 15:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. :) JamieS93 20:09, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was about time I cleaned out my page anyway. Free (talk) ^(HRWiki) 21:08, 7 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Album Project

Please do not The Album Project to articles, it does not pass WP:RS or WP:ALBUM guidelines. It is a personal blog-like review site, not a Professional source. This is not insinuating they have bad reviews, it is just not a reliable source for use on Wikipedia. Kiac (talk) 12:12, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, I may have added it once or twice, I can't remember. I won't add it again. Free (talk) ^(HRWiki) 12:54, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It was to QU (album) It's nothing personal, I just try and crack down on it quickly; the more people that know the right way, the better. Thanks for being understanding. Kiac (talk) 13:38, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, an anonymous editor added that. I added the Jesus Freak Hideout review. Free (talk) ^(HRWiki) 14:22, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh my god... I am sorry. Now I feel like a complete tool. Haha. Kiac (talk) 14:24, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Know how that feels...happens to everyone I'm sure. Free (talk) ^(HRWiki) 14:25, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Jonas Myrin

Hi, I've noticed your edit to the page and was just wondering if you could add it to your watchlist, because someone keeps removing sourced information pertaining to Myrin's ministry in Hillsong and other work in Christian music. This is just in case if I miss some edit which can and must be reverted.:) Garik 11 (talk) 15:44, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Free (talk) ^(HRWiki) 22:37, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sidewalk Prophets

If you still feel up to it, the article could use a bunch of expansion. I found them on Billboard's Christian Songs chart and made up something that should stick, but it could use some help with expansion. I used the admin mop thingie to find the deleted history of the article to be useless. It was either a bunch of copyright violations or written with a tone that doesn't belong in an encyclopedia. Thanks! Royal broil 01:27, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'll see what I can do. Free (talk) 17:32, 3 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Paul Coleman

The article Paul Coleman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Lacks notability & sources. Article has been the target of a major hoax/attack recently. Subject requests deletion (OTRS: 2012072710000744)

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Errant ^(chat!) 14:50, 31 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of ITunes Live from SoHo (Counting Crows album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article ITunes Live from SoHo (Counting Crows album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ITunes Live from SoHo (Counting Crows album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. — Status (talk · contribs) 12:51, 12 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shine On (Needtobreathe song)

The article Shine On (Needtobreathe song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable recording. Minor success on smaller chart.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:00, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of More Time

The article More Time has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable recording. Minor success on charts.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 08:01, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ordinary (Train song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ordinary (Train song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ordinary (Train song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DBZFan30 (talk) 20:21, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Best of the Sugar Hill Years (Reckless Kelly album)

The article Best of the Sugar Hill Years (Reckless Kelly album) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Trains2050 (talk) 09:22, 10 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]