User talk:Thetagger766

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for being a sock puppet of User:Qais13. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. DrKiernan (talk) 21:14, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thetagger766 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I see no real reason apart from the sock puppet for me being blocked, this is quite annoying and I'd like to see some justice as i am being trolled by the user DrKiernan

Decline reason:

If you are a sock puppet, then that is sufficient grounds for a block. PhilKnight (talk) 11:27, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thetagger766 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

but I'm not a sockpuppet, I don't have anything to do with that account so on what terms am I being constantly harassed for, is it because the user DrKiernan doesn't like what I edit; it's got to the point where I am quite annoyed, there's no proof of me being a sockpuppet, if I said that user was me then that would be proof!

Decline reason:

You're going to need to stick to a position. Let me help you; this is clearly a sock account, created 40 minutes after the last sock was block and editing the same low traffic articles in the same ways. Now, I would suggest using your original account to address the behavior that led to the original block. Kuru (talk) 12:35, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Thetagger766 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

but how many humans are there in this world and how many do you think have a wiki account, there's probably a few made every day, so there's still no proof of what I've done wrong so wrong again!!

Decline reason:

Resumed editing as 82.132.216.14 (talk · contribs · WHOIS). DrKiernan (talk) 17:24, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.