User talk:TheseGlyphs

This is TheseGlyphs's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Green Economy Coalition has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Green Economy Coalition. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 22:27, 5 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Green Economy Coalition has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Green Economy Coalition. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 22:08, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Green Economy Coalition has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Green Economy Coalition. Thanks! — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:35, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Green Economy Coalition (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NewYorkActuary was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

More than half of the references are either from the organization itself or that mention it only in passing (if at all). Of the rest, the two that seemed the most useful (from the IUCN and WWF) both address the Coalition's initial actions back in 2009, when it sent a letter to the G20. But I'm not seeing anything that speaks to the enduring notability that we expect for an encyclopedic entry.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Green Economy Coalition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

NewYorkActuary (talk) 10:28, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! TheseGlyphs, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! NewYorkActuary (talk) 10:28, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Green Economy Coalition (May 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Galobtter was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Previous comments still apply. Need significant coverage, not them being mentioned, in indepedant sources evaluating them etc

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Green Economy Coalition and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Green Economy Coalition, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Galobtter (pingó mió) 05:17, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]