User talk:Theophilusbisio
May 2024
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of Pipli Sahib. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Since you're a new editor, take the time to understand what constitutes a reliable source on Wikipedia. Also see reliable sources noticeboard archives for further information. Religious POV pushing is not allowed. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 09:54, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- disruptive??? Why r u giving warning instead of talking peacefully Theophilusbisio (talk) 09:56, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- You said you couldn't find the words "Indecisive" from Ganda Singh, when the section's title is literally "Indecisive Battle of Amritsar". There's a Sikh nationalist clique on Wikipedia which utilizes an extreme amount of sock and meat puppetry to project their religion as militarily superior, disregarding facts and neutrality, and unfortunately Wikipedia is far too lenient with them. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 10:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Again doing false allegations do I look a Sikh nationalist to u?? But indeed u look like an afgahn pov pushing editor. Let me research more abt sikh victory at pipli sahib. See u 😘 Theophilusbisio (talk) 10:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- You must use reliable sources to add content. As I said, take time to read WP:RS and WP:RSN. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 10:10, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- Again doing false allegations do I look a Sikh nationalist to u?? But indeed u look like an afgahn pov pushing editor. Let me research more abt sikh victory at pipli sahib. See u 😘 Theophilusbisio (talk) 10:03, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- You said you couldn't find the words "Indecisive" from Ganda Singh, when the section's title is literally "Indecisive Battle of Amritsar". There's a Sikh nationalist clique on Wikipedia which utilizes an extreme amount of sock and meat puppetry to project their religion as militarily superior, disregarding facts and neutrality, and unfortunately Wikipedia is far too lenient with them. Southasianhistorian8 (talk) 10:00, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
Blocked as a sockpuppet
[edit]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:AdityaNakul per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/AdityaNakul. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped. Girth Summit (blether) 13:51, 1 June 2024 (UTC)
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.