User talk:Themrbeaumont

Themrbeaumont, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Themrbeaumont! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Gestrid (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 4 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Faustmann (March 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Possibly notable based on Faustmann's formula, but the article does not need to be asking questions itself, and "elegant solution" is subjective and is contained within an completely unreferenced text block.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Martin Faustmann and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 08:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Martin Faustmann has been accepted

Martin Faustmann, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 04:54, 18 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hope you can help with forestry

Hello @Themrbeaumont

I hope your academic work is going well. I am struggling a bit with the carbon absorbed by forests. I wonder if you might have time to advise us (Wikiproject Climate change) at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Forestry Chidgk1 (talk) 15:20, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Chidgk1!

Sorry for my slow reply, I'm new here and not used to looking for notifications and whatnot.

I liked reading the discussion at https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Climate_change#How_to_clean_up_the_mess_around_trees_and_mitigation?

Did I understand correctly that in the end, I missed everything and you already carried out the merges? If so, my apologies again and nice work—just looking at the topics (haven't looked closely at the articles themselves yet) I definitely think you had the right idea to consolidate stuff within those topics.

Please feel free to ping me again in the future and I'll try to be more responsive! Thanks again Themrbeaumont (talk) 16:33, 18 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is always more to do! Another merge has been proposed - of Forestation. Perhaps you would have time to support or oppose at that merge discussion Chidgk1 (talk) 10:03, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Talk:Forest%20management at the bottom Chidgk1 (talk) 10:06, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like I was again too slow and again you guys did a great job. Thanks for pinging me and I still aspire to get into the habit of checking for notifications! Themrbeaumont (talk) 11:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lapa do Picareiro has been accepted

Lapa do Picareiro, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Devonian Wombat (talk) 13:00, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia from WikiProject Climate Change!

Thanks for helping edit Climate Change content on Wikipedia! WikiProject Climate Change is a group of editors who strive to improve the quality of climate change articles here on Wikipedia. I noticed that you are interested in editing articles related to climate change topics; we need more editors like you in the community.

Wikipedia is one the most requested, published, accessed, and consulted source of information on climate change and sustainability in every language. As an editing community, we think Wikipedia is one of the best ways for sharing knowledge about the climate crises, and also the best path to help decision makers and communicators at all levels of society, including journalists, policy makers, politicians, and decision makers.

If you want to do more, here are some suggestions:

Content is much more likely to stick if you have good citations. Check out our recommended sources collection to learn what kinds of sources we think are best.
If you are looking for ideas on what to edit, consider one of the Small to medium tasks suggestions.
Be bold and join the discussion! The Wikipedia community includes a wide variety of editors with different interests, skills, and knowledge. We all manage to get along through a lot of discussion that happens under the scenes and through the bold, revert, discuss editing cycle.
Please leave a message on the on the WikiProject Climate change talk page if you have concerns that involve multiple articles, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing. Or for general questions about how Wikipedia works, feel free to ask at the Wikipedia Teahouse.

Feel free to respond to this note if you have any questions. I wish you all the best! EMsmile (talk) 07:46, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]