User talk:Themanilaxperience

Hello, Themanilaxperience, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Introduction
The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
Also feel free to make test edits in the sandbox.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to leave me a message or place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.

-iaN LOPEZ 1115 09:49, 22 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Purpleline.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Purpleline.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:48, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bonifacio Global City

The issue with Global City set to overtake Makati is debatable as we don't know what can happen in the future or whether it can achieve its goal. So I still stand on using rival than to overtake.

Even if The Philippine Stock Exchange will move to The Fort, the majority of our national financial institutions and other major Philippine corporations are based in Makati and still have their headquarters there. And have no plans to move.

Themanilaxperience (talk) 14:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Good day Themanilaxperience, please see the reference on that issue as to why BGC will overtake Makati. I keep on reverting your edits because it is not supported by any reliable source. Recently, most multinational companies are putting up their headquarters in BGC.

PH 0447 (talk) 03:27, 4 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Hyatt Manila

Please consider the first citation in the article Grand Hyatt Manila, the height to the tip of the spire is within that citation before reverting the edit. I understand an earlier Manila Times article cite lists the 318 m height but surely an architectural document is more reliable than one mere passing mention of a news article?Hariboneagle927 (talk) 15:45, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also please explain why do you have to revert the edit regarding the logo size? The building is the main subject and the logo is still readable even at a reduced size.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 15:51, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, your reply on my talk page, and I updated the provided citation regarding the height. ThanksHariboneagle927 (talk) 16:08, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The logo size? My apologies for that, made a mistake::: Themanilaxperience (talk) 16:10, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No problem.Hariboneagle927 (talk) 16:17, 4 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Pinoy hip hop, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 16:07, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Pinoy hip hop; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 16:30, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The thing is that, many in the Pinoy Hip-Hop Community are support my content as I have supported them since the scene and if there is one person that can create such content, that would be me. Besides, many of the previous sources there came from my 2002 website, pinoyrap.com Themanilaxperience (talk) 01:03, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have been with the scene since its explosion since the 1990s and have a strong connection with those in the industry.

So if there is someone who has extreme knowledge about the scene, that would be me. Themanilaxperience (talk) 01:07, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have received complaints from those in the industry complaining with how the articles were written and I volunteered to fix them. Themanilaxperience (talk) 01:09, 12 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here.

It cannot come from an editor's personal knowledge, since relying on that is prohibited by Wikipedia policy. Nightscream (talk) 17:45, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Real World: Back to New York

Hi. Please stop adding uncited material to articles, as you did with this edit to The Real World: Back to New York, as this violates Wikipedia's Verifiability policy, a point about which Materialscientist warned you above back in December. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 17:45, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The citations I can provide concerning the issue on RW Back to New York are,

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R5Zo76frLU0&t=503s

And,

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm1044884/

In the RW RR Casting special, it cited that Rachel B is from Orland, Park, IL.

Themanilaxperience (talk) 04:34, 19 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:20, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm Howard the Duck. I noticed that you recently removed content from Bongbong Marcos without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Howard the Duck (talk) 02:49, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:44, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]