User talk:Theman745

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nils Vogt (comedian), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nils Vogt (comedian) was changed by Theman745 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.986864 on 2011-06-03T15:12:50+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 15:12, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at John David Booty with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Free Bear (talk) 15:16, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Henry Theory of Government

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Henry Theory of Government requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Acroterion (talk) 00:04, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Henry Theory of Government

A tag has been placed on Henry Theory of Government, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Appears to be fake: [1]

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. CTJF83 00:09, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Henry Theory of Government, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. CTJF83 00:09, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Criticism of Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Criticism of Wikipedia was changed by Theman745 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.962292 on 2011-06-04T00:19:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:19, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Prolog (talk) 01:31, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theman745 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I love wikipedia. I get frustrated with occasionally but I love to be part of this great organization. Please don't kick me off. I understand what I did and I will never do it again. Thank You.

Decline reason:

Your comments above are positive, but the comments you added below make me think that you don't understand the reasons for your block. You were blocked for posting things you've made up. Please read my comment at the bottom of the page, read the links provided, and come back and address the reasons for your block. Acroterion (talk) 16:52, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have been falsely Blocked

To whom ever reads this another administer is framing me. I am being silence because of the truth. I say that any administrator who silences the truth stands against what wikipedia stands for. When I joined this website, I thought that I would be able to speak my mind. Well, apparently no wikipedia stands for whatever some administrator likes. Show me wikipedia, that you do stand for free speech and the right to think.

I've fixed your unblock request, but your commentary immediately above pretty much scuttles your chances. You were not framed - I was ready to block you as well. You may not post things you've made up and named after your cat. There is no free speech on Wikipedia; see WP:FREESPEECH, nor is "free thought" encouraged: see WP:V, WP:RS and WP:NOR to see why. When you've read all that, perhaps you can come back here and amend your comments. You will need to acknowledge the reason you were blocked. Acroterion (talk) 16:48, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So in other words you are telling me wikipedia is soviet russia on the internet? Your own system will destroy you. You have made a bad enemy.

We are telling you you can't make things up and put them into the encyclopedia, nor can you expect a kind welcome when you do so. Wikipedia isn't an anarchy or a democracy: you may expect your contributions to be scrutinized, ruthlessly edited, and if you can't follow the rules or contribute appropriately, you may expect to have your editing privileges revoked. You are judged on the merits of your contributions. Acroterion (talk) 21:05, 4 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm so feed up with this system you have set in place. Acroterion or whatever you weird alias is, you need to take a chill. No credible source takes wikipedia seriously and who are you to challenge my beliefs. You wrote up a complaint about my article "Henry Theory of Government" but what if someone actually believes in that, what if I do believe in that. By taking that down you insulted my ideas. I actually believed in that and you took it down because you are some socialistic freedom hater.

People believe all sorts of things, including that they have a right to troll here. I believe this conversation has run its course. Acroterion (talk) 00:31, 5 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You know what, you insulted me. Why do you hate freedom you disgusting monster. I hope you know that you will be getting about thirty complaints, at uh, oh i don't know TOMORROW. And uh one more thing. Who are you to judge Henry's Theory of Government?