User talk:Thelostone41

Thelostone41, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Thelostone41! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

February 2021

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Soviet offensive plans controversy, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 03:48, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am striking this message because it was a mistake based on a single out of context edit when it was part of a series of edits. Sorry for the mistake. Donner60 (talk) 03:56, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks just was trying to do work on a page that needs it.Thelostone41 (talk) 03:59, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

DS alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

My very best wishes (talk) 22:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Are you Driverofknowledge (talk · contribs)? -> [1]. My very best wishes (talk) 23:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No I am not Driverofknowledge?

WP:HOUND

page - [2] - you never edited this page before; you followed my edits on this page after 2 hours, only to revert all of them, with justification like that. You repeatedly reverted my edits after that.
page - [3] - you never edited this page before; you followed my edits on this page after 13 minutes, to revert one of them, but then all of them. Note that you tried to include poorly sourced info. You repeatedly reverted my edits after that.
page [4] - you never edited this page before; you followed my edits on this page after 11 minutes, only to revert all of them. Note that you tried to include poorly sourced/unsourced info. You repeatedly reverted my edits after that.
page [5] - you followed my edit after an hour.
you submitted a battleground report about me on AN. This is a battleground report because what is your complaint? Simply that I submitted two SPI requests? They were actually legit. Two socks were blocked.
You complained about me to two administrators.

And this is not all. Can you please stop following my edits and complaining about me to administrators at the same time?

Thank you. My very best wishes (talk) 02:58, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So that was your response? My very best wishes (talk) 03:58, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

1 page was on my watch list.

2 page was on my watch list.

3 same as number 2 and 1.

4 no I added a new source to the page as you saw and did not undo anything you did.

5 War of annihilation ‎was on my watch list do to Mikhail Meltyukhov Source I had.

6 I explained why I did on the Admin Note bored.

And you undid my edit from 3 months ago?Thelostone41 (talk) 04:26, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Georgy Aleksandrovich Kumanev has been accepted

Georgy Aleksandrovich Kumanev, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

scope_creep^Talk 11:06, 4 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ukraine Anniversary medal "70 years of Victory over Nazism" (July 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Clearfrienda were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ukraine Anniversary medal "70 years of Victory over Nazism" and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ukraine Anniversary medal "70 years of Victory over Nazism", click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Clear friend a ^💬 14:34, 4 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPA

[6] - no, I edited this page long before you did [7]. My very best wishes (talk) 02:28, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am talking about the other pages this has happened on.Thelostone41 (talk) 02:43, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My very best wishes I will take this to administrators as it seems like anything I do you don't like you fight me to the death about and try to get my banned.Thelostone41 (talk) 02:50, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, sure, you are welcome to ask for assistance from any administrator. I can see that you are struggling with policies, such as WP:CONSENSUS, etc. Perhaps they can help. My very best wishes (talk) 03:10, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Soviet offensive plans controversy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anglo-French alliance. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]