User talk:Thefivetones

Welcome

Hello, Thefivetones, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory Help directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Our new user help forum, the Teahouse Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Tumblr blog

Hi there. I saw that you added a few links to what I assume is your own Tumblr blog. The problem is that Wikipedia requires citations to be to what we call "reliable sources" – generally, articles written by professional journalists or published academics on a site that has editorial control. Self-published blogs don't qualify under these rules except in certain circumstances, such as when they're written by a recognized expert, such as published physicist who critiques the physics in a science fiction film. Also, I saw that you added the site as an external link. The problem is that we generally don't link to fan sites. Unfortunately, there really isn't a lot of room on Wikipedia for fan blogs. However, your blog indicates that you like to collect sources. If you cited these sources directly, instead of your own blog, that would be welcome. One pitfall to be wary of when writing Wikipedia articles is original research – adding your own analysis. It can be difficult to switch from posting opinions on your blog to simply reporting facts neutrally on Wikipedia. If you have any issues, feel free to raise them at the tea house, a forum for new users on Wikipedia. Or you can leave a message on my talk page. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Hi Thefivetones! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Anthony Elanga that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 18:47, 26 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox stats

Please note that we only include domestic league games in the infobox - so no Cup or Continental matches etc. Please also ensure that when you update the stats you also update the date, using ~~~~~. If you have any questions please ask. Giant Snowman 18:26, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Again, at Danel Sinani. Robby.is.on (talk) 10:20, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Josh Eccles, you may be blocked from editing. Struway2 (talk) 10:42, 14 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

DataPOWA moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, DataPOWA, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CUPIDICAE💕 19:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DataPOWA (May 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HenryTemplo was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DataPOWA and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DataPOWA, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

HenryTemplo (talk) 06:43, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thefivetones! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! HenryTemplo (talk) 06:43, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:DataPOWA

Hello, Thefivetones. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:DataPOWA, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:33, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:DataPOWA

Hello, Thefivetones. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "DataPOWA".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:52, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]