User talk:Thedeccas

Hi. Sorry, but no. Bands are required to meet an extremely high level of notability in order to be included. You can find the info here. Furthermore, your username indicates that you're involved with the project, making it a conflict of interest. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:45, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, reinstating the article won't take but a moment. My advice would be to add as many third-party references as you can based on the criteria. By the way, thanks for actually taking the time to read them, thanks for being nice and for clarifying your choice of username. There's a policy here of assuming good faith, so I'll go ahead and restore it. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:58, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

All set. I moved the page to the proper title of The Deccas. Your original title of The deccas is now an automatic redirect. Again, thank you so much for being so gracious. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:59, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure, Sam. Good luck on the new article and welcome to the project!

PMDrive1061 has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

February 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Deccas has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.myspace.com/bbckentintroducing (matching the regex rule \bmyspace\.com).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:40, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Ham tech person 02:55, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]