User talk:Thecapitalking

Welcome!

Hello, Thecapitalking, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, if you receive, or expect to receive, compensation for any contribution you make, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation to comply with our terms of use and our policy on paid editing.

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Best practices for editors with close associations
Plain and simple conflict of interest guide
The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! —Unforgettableid (talk) 07:25, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sheikh Waziri for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sheikh Waziri is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheikh Waziri until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ².O.^Boxing 21:04, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know the name Sheikh Waziri is listed, if at all, on BoxRec as? This could maybe help prevent the article being deleted. – ².O.^Boxing 00:13, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ahmed Mazloum

The article Ahmed Mazloum has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not enough evidence of passing WP:GNG (besides All Africa article, not enough significant coverage by reliable sources)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — MarkH₂₁^talk 07:59, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thank you, id research further to get substantial and reliable sources for the article and update it Thecapitalking (talk) 08:26, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Sheikh Waziri has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Sheikh Waziri. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:39, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sheikh Waziri (January 16)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sheikh Waziri. The previous deletion discussion was only three weeks ago, so that very little has changed. If this submission is substantially different, you may Request Undeletion only to demonstrate that this draft is better than the deleted article. You may instead request Deletion Review, but that will involve demonstrating an error in the deletion. Do not resubmit this draft without either showing a substantial change or without deletion review.

If another article or draft is submitted without following these instructions, it may be salted.

Robert McClenon (talk) 23:42, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Thecapitalking! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 23:42, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gwamba (January 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Gwamba instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gwamba and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gwamba, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 07:33, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ronke Sokefun

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ronke Sokefun requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://wimbizannualconference.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majavah ^(t/c) 05:22, 22 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

i was auto blocked unjustly because of my IP address

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Thecapitalking (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Thecapitalking (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by Odzwale. The reason given for Odzwale's block is: "Abusing multiple accounts".

Blocking administrator: ‪Yamla‬ (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: Procedural decline; autoblock has expired. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 15:18, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Patrick Eidusi

The article Patrick Eidusi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article has been written purely in advertising form and fails WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abishe (talk) 11:59, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Patrick Eidusi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Patrick Eidusi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Praxidicae (talk) 20:26, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Thecapitalking

Thank you for creating Gwamba.

User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Nice work!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|North8000}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 23:58, 7 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Odum Chijioke John moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Odum Chijioke John, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 18:03, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, I’d work on it and submit for review . Thecapitalking (talk) 18:07, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odum Chijioke John (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

this is a promotional bio, not an encyclopedia article .

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Odum Chijioke John and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Odum Chijioke John, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 05:17, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Uncle Azeez

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Uncle Azeez requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Sanyam.wikime (talk) 04:15, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Wole Lawal

The article Wole Lawal has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Celestina007 (talk) 16:07, 8 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

Your addition to Wole Lawal has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Diannaa (talk) 11:30, 9 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Nwaora Augustine David for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nwaora Augustine David is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nwaora Augustine David until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 07:30, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Thecapitalking. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.

Again, declaring which articles you have been hired to create is mandatory per this policy. bonadea contributions talk 08:03, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for this, id work on the article and improve it better. I really appreciate Thecapitalking (talk) 08:32, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

May 2020

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Thecapitalking, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Thecapitalking|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 09:12, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I didn’t understand what it meant earlier, but I’m not directly or Indirectly being paid for my contributions on Wikipedia, i love creating pages and i create pages for people i know, or rather who i feel is notable enough to have a Wikipedia page. I create pages to further improve my skills. Not in anyway paid or promotional. Thecapitalking (talk) 10:43, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi please i have responded but I haven’t gotten a reply for you "@Bonadea:" Thecapitalking (talk) 21:30, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Melo Eggleston for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Melo Eggleston is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Melo Eggleston until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 15:37, 12 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Wole Lawal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wole Lawal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wole Lawal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 08:23, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odum Chijioke John (May 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lapablo was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A whole lot REFBOMBING. Not adequately sourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Odum Chijioke John and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Odum Chijioke John, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Lapablo (talk) 21:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Steve Chuks for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Steve Chuks is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Steve Chuks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 19:06, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

You still have not responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying you may be blocked from editing. bonadea contributions talk 13:32, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I responded and clarified that I am not a paid editor but didn't get any response. Thecapitalking (talk) 15:31, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ahmed Mazloum for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ahmed Mazloum is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahmed Mazloum until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. bonadea contributions talk 15:50, 7 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Odum Chijioke John has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Odum Chijioke John. Thanks! An@ss_koko^{(speak up)} 22:47, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dapo Awofisayo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dapo Awofisayo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dapo Awofisayo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 01:38, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dapo Awofisayo for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dapo Awofisayo is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dapo Awofisayo until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Celestina007 01:44, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sheikh Waziri

Hello, Thecapitalking. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sheikh Waziri".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:01, 26 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm Unforgettableid. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your article Nwaora Augustine David seemed less than neutral and has been deleted; please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nwaora Augustine David. Thank you. —Unforgettableid (talk) 06:59, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

UPE suspicion and a reply from Celestina007

Despite your protestations to the contrary, we still think you may be an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional undisclosed paid edits, you may be blocked from editing. If you have ever been paid to create Wikipedia articles, now is a good time to disclose the truth. If you do so, we can allow you to continue to create new pages.

Most of your creations have already been deleted. Even if you're not a paid editor, I encourage you to always put new articles through the Articles for Creation (AfC) process instead of creating them directly. This process takes time, but may help reduce the chances of your creations getting deleted later.

Regards, —Unforgettableid (talk) 07:27, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Unforgettableid, I share your concerns on UPE by the editor but with no evidence I am yet to report them. When it comes to the UPE ring in Nigeria or amongst shady Nigerian editors, a major red flag is observing the creation of pages on “Businessmen” a perfect example would be their most recent article which is the Dapo Awofisayo article. Also, pertaining to the UPE ring, it isn’t uncommon to see them(the more experienced UPE editors) be very productive editors, in the end it is a strategy in order to avoid suspicion & evade scrutiny.Celestina007 12:38, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confession regarding undisclosed paid editing

Hi as i have stated before, i joined Wikipedia for the passion actually, and From my first article, its was plain neutral, ok I wouldn’t deny i was paid for some articles at a point, but they were all deleted and since i was warned, i have never tried it again, please i dont want to be blocked, I really want to be a part of this, just tell me what to do and id do it please Thecapitalking (talk) 06:03, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dear User:Thecapitalking: Do you agree that, from now on:

you will never create any pages in mainspace, and
you will never move any pages into mainspace, and
you will always use the Article Wizard to create and submit drafts?

If you do agree, we might consider having mercy upon you, at least for now.

By the way: Paid editing is strongly discouraged, but if someone ever insists on doing paid editing, they must follow all the rules listed at WP:PAID.

Kind regards, —Unforgettableid (talk) 13:26, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

All my paid edits have been deleted, please don’t let my months of hard work and research go down the drain please, i have stated the truth please consider, please. Thecapitalking (talk) 06:19, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, and promise to adhere strictly please. Thank you so much, I really appreciate Thecapitalking (talk) 13:30, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. —Unforgettableid (talk) 03:38, 10 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Odum Chijioke John

Hello, Thecapitalking. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Odum Chijioke John".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:37, 7 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of George Omoraro for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article George Omoraro is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/George Omoraro until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Citterz (talk) 19:17, 12 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

George Omoraro moved to draftspace

Strong COI/UPE concerns

Final warning on undisclosed paid editing

You may be blocked from editing without further warning if you make any further edits without responding to the inquiry you received regarding undisclosed paid editing. Celestina007 (talk) 00:38, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your final warning on undisclosed paid editing, if you create any more dubious article, I am seeing to it that you are handed an indefinite block for not being here to build an encyclopedia, rather, to enrich yourself through UPE. I repeat, this is your final warning. Celestina007 (talk) 00:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Noted Thecapitalking (talk) 01:18, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thecapitalking, just above this post is one from August last year, where you promised that you would not create articles in mainspace. Your very next edit, a few months later, was to create Unique Kings in mainspace. That is a promotional piece about an individual who doesn't appear to be notable in the least, and which contains this source which makes blatantly false claims of him being a "certified Wikipedia editor" – is it your own autobiography? In addition, you created the George Omoraro article. You clearly have no interest in following Wikipedia's policies. --bonadea contributions talk 14:17, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Multiple accounts

What is your connection to User:Mark Yung Chukwuebuka? --bonadea contributions talk 14:30, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Thecapitalking. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. – bradv🍁 15:02, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:George Omoraro

Hello, Thecapitalking. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:George Omoraro, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occurred, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:George Omoraro

Hello, Thecapitalking. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "George Omoraro".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Eternal Shadow Talk 00:33, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lord Lamba

The article Lord Lamba has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:ENT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Princess of Ara 16:43, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]