Jump to content

User talk:Theblokedone

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


August 2018

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lord of Vermilion: The Crimson King has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:21, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Blade & Soul to Blade & Soul (anime) (your addition has since been removed). While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 14:14, 6 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

so yeah?

[edit]

On Black Clover don't expand the episode table if it's going to be empty. Because right now the known episode that is airing is at episode 50 and as from the TV Tokyo, it tells what is 51. But not 52 yet and does Adult Swim is showing season 2 yet? Then you would still need to show the info on that too. If their like 10 or so episodes behind. Tainted-wingsz (talk) 13:47, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Blade & Soul (anime) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from http://blade-and-soul.wikia.com/wiki/Blade_%26_Soul_(anime). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. signed, Rosguill talk 23:28, 13 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to List of One Piece episodes (season 19) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. —Farix (t | c) 00:56, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The next episode was shown in a preview. Theblokedone (talk) 01:00, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop copying content from other websites, such as Wikia, because this is a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. You must either write an original summary or leave the summary field blank. If you continue to violate copyright policies, you will be reported to the administrators' noticeboard and subsequently blocked. —Farix (t | c) 11:09, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blade & Soul

[edit]

Hi! You seem to be trying to split part of the content of Blade & Soul into Blade & Soul (anime) against the opinion of several other editors. There's just no point in continuing to make the same edit over and over again – that is edit-warring, and can get you blocked if you persist in it. What you should do is start a discussion on the talk-page, explaining your reasons for doing what you want to do. If other editors agree (or even if nobody objects in a reasonable time), you'll be able to go ahead and make the changes; if they don't agree, consensus is against you, and you should accept that. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:36, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to List of One Piece episodes (season 19) has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. You simply cannot copy plot summaries from other websites.Farix (t | c) 10:08, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of One Piece episodes (season 19). —Farix (t | c) 20:56, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

[edit]

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Theblokedone, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Farix (t | c) 23:46, 20 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

October 2018

[edit]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  TonyBallioni (talk) 00:45, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I'm RonBot, a script that checks new non-free file uploads. I have found that the subject image that you recently uploaded was more than 5% in excess of the Non-free content guideline size of 100,000 pixels. I have tagged the image for a standard reduction, which (for jpg/gif/png/svg files) normally happens within a day. Please check the reduced image, and make sure that the image is not excessively corrupted. Other files will be added to Category:Wikipedia non-free file size reduction requests for manual processing. There is a full seven-day period before the original oversized image will be hidden; during that time you might want to consider editing the original image yourself (perhaps an initial crop to allow a smaller reduction or none at all). A formula for calculation the desired size can be found at WP:Image resolution, along with instructions on how to tag the image in the rare cases that it requires an oversized image (typically about 0.2% of non-free uploads are tagged as necessarily oversized). Please contact the bot owner if you have any questions, or you can ask them at Wikipedia talk:Non-free content. See User:RonBot for info on how to not get these messages. RonBot (talk) 21:25, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Seven Deadly Sins the Movie, Prisoners of the Sky.png

[edit]
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Seven Deadly Sins the Movie, Prisoners of the Sky.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:12, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Theblokedone (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

It's been years since the blocks and I'm no longer the person I was when it happened. I matured enough and what to try to earn a second chance the right way. And, If I'm denied that's all right. I thought I just try to plead my case. Theblokedone (talk) 03:32, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 03:53, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Theblokedone (talk) 03:32, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]