User talk:Theautomator2017

Welcome!

Hello, Theautomator2017, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Too Young, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page and how to develop articles
Help pages
Tutorial
Article wizard for creating new articles
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Yashovardhan (talk) 21:40, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

March 2017

Thank you for your edit to the disambiguation page Too Young. However, please note that disambiguation pages are not articles; rather, they are meant to help readers find a specific article quickly and easily. From the disambiguation dos and don'ts, you should:

Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
- Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
Do not insert external links or references

Thank you. Yashovardhan (talk) 21:44, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Theautomator2017, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Theautomator2017! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 19 March 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Frederic Schindler for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frederic Schindler is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frederic Schindler until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 19:20, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Randall Poster

The article Randall Poster has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. —Non-Dropframe _talk 23:30, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Music supervisors

Our notability standards on Wikipedia are contingent upon a person being the subject of media coverage. A person who works behind the scenes is not exempted from having to get their name into the media just because they're notable "in their field" — because we're not a résumé directory of people who are notable in their field, but an encyclopedia about people who are notable and recognizable to the public. There are lots of jobs one can have where their work might be important in its field, but they simply don't have the depth of public profile needed to actually support a Wikipedia article — and those people simply don't get to have Wikipedia articles.

It's important to understand that because Wikipedia is an article that anybody can edit, we can't guarantee that everybody who edits Wikipedia is always doing so responsibly. Our articles are routinely dirtwashed by "enemies" of the article subject, with stuff like what an evil bastard the person is because he "stiffed" them in a contract negotiation last week or something like that — and without reliable source coverage about him to support the article, we have no way to properly sort out what's true and what isn't. So "no coverage means no article" is not meant to punish those people — it's meant to protect them, because having a Wikipedia article can actually be a double-edged sword with much more negative consequences than you might think. Bearcat (talk) 00:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]